Tidak Yakin Dengan Ketelusan PDRM dan SPRM Kerajaan Selangor akan Gunakan Penyiasat Luar Untuk Menyiasat Sharizat Jalil

Kuching

Sunday, 4th December 2011

Adakah wajar rancangan Ketua Menteri Selangor Tan Sri Khalid untuk mengupah penyiasat luar bagi menyiasat Ketua Wanita UMNO Datuk Seri Shahrizat Abdul Jalil dan keluarga? Tindakan ini berikutan daripada penyataan PDRM yang mengatakan bahawa tidak ada kes salah laku di dalam projek ternakan lembu yang dikelolakan oleh Perbadanan Fidlot Kebangsaan (NFC)yang menelan belanja RM 250 juta. Kenyataan Timbalan Ketua Polis Negara Datuk Seri Khalid Abu Bakar yang mengatakan tiada unsur pecah amanah atau penyelewengan merupakan sesuatu yang bertentangan dengan persepsi majoriti rakyat Malaysia. Untuk mengetahui samada projek ini ada melibatkan pecah amanah atau penyelewengan, mari kita buat ujian berikut :-

Sekiranya keluarga Sharizat tiada kaitan dengan UMNO atau penyokong Pakatan Rakyat atau neural dari segi politik, adakah kerajaan akan memberikan RM 250 juta kepada keluarga Sharizat yang kosong pengalaman di dalam bidang ternakan lembu?"...Sekiranya tidak, maka adalah wajar Tan Sri Khalid menggunakan khidmat penyiasat luar.

Seperti yang dilaporkan oleh Free Malaysia Today, Tan Sri Khalid (atas) memaklumkan bahawa Kerajaan negeri Selangor sedia memperuntukkan dana bagi tujuan membiayai kos penyiasatan oleh pakar luar negara berhubung skandal projek ternakan lembu yang dikelolakan oleh Perbadanan Fidlot Kebangsaan (NFC).

Katanya, kaedah menggunakan penyiasat dari luar negara merupakan pendekatan yang sering diguna-pakai oleh kebanyakan negara maju bagi menyelesaikan jenayah kolar putih atau jenayah bersifat korporat.

Saya serahkan kepada pengarah strategi PKR, Rafizi Ramli dan setiausaha PKR, Saifuddin Nasution. Mereka akan membuat pembentangan kepada pihak polis dan MACC supaya menunjukkan pekara yang perlu diperhatikan oleh pihak polis.“Ini adalah perkara baru di Malaysia tetapi perkara ini sangat dijaga di Britain dan Australia,” katanya dipetik oleh TV Selangor.

PKR sebelum ini mendakwa sejumlah RM250 juta dana awam diberikan kepada syarikat berkenaan yang dikaitkan dengan suami Menteri Pembangunan, Wanita dan Keluarga Datuk Seri Shahrizat Abdul Jalil. Bagaimanapun wang itu didakwa telah disalahguna sehingga projek tersebut dikatakan dalam ‘kucar-kacir’ seperti dirumuskan dalam Laporan Ketua Audit Negara 2010.

PKR kemudiannya mendedahkan wang tersebut digunakan oleh NFC bagi membeli dua buah unit kondominium mewah di Bangsar bernilai RM13.8 juta. Selain itu, PKR turut mendakwa sejumlah RM5 juta pula dibelanja untuk membeli kereta Mercedes Benz dan tanah di Putrajaya serta RM588,585 disalurkan kepada syarikat-syarikat milik keluarga menteri itu.

Selain PKR, Jawatankuasa Kira-kira Wang Negara (PAC) juga berpendapat siasatan awal mendapati beberapa kelemahan yang berlaku pada awal perancangan dan juga perlaksanaan.

Bagaimanapun, Khamis lalu Timbalan Ketua Polis Negara Datuk Seri Khalid Abu Bakar (atas) berkata tiada unsur pecah amanah atau penyelewengan dalam isu dana NFC dan pembelian kondominium mewah berkenaan.

Isu projek lembu juga mencuri tumpuan pada perhimpunan agung Umno 2011 dengan sebahagian besar perwakilan menuntut penjelasan lanjut daripada ketua wanita Umno itu.

Kita berharap, sekiranya betullah tiada tiada unsur pecah amanah atau penyelewengan dalam isu dana NFC dan pembelian kondominium mewah, kerajaan pusat seharusnya menyokong tindakan kerajaan Selangor untuk mengupah penyiasat luar. Walaupun Bukittunggal tiada data yang sah/resmi tetapi daripada komen yang diperolehi daripada blog-blog di Malaysia rata-rata daripada mereka percaya bahawa berlaku unsur pecah amanah atau penyelewengan dalam isu dana NFC dan pembelian kondominium mewah.

Saya percaya, untuk mengembalikan keyakinan rakyat terhadap ketelusan serta bebas rasuah kerajaan pimpinan beliau, saya percaya beliau akan menyokong tindakan Tan Sri Khalid untuk mengupah penyiasat luar.

  

Guan Eng Menyifatkan Perbuatan Muhyiddin dan Ahmad Maslan Memperalatkan Kaum Cina serta Agama Kristian Bagaikan Taktik Hitler

Kuching
Wednesday, 30th November 2011

Inilah sifat sebenar UMNO. Mereka sanggup menggadai toleransi kaum demi untuk menarik simpati kaum Melayu....Remaung6Renjer

Timbalan Presiden UMNO Muhyiddin Yassin dan Ketua Penerangan UMNO Ahmad Maslan sedang bermain dengan api dengan memangsakan kaum-kaum minoriti di Malaysia sebagai ancaman untuk menakutkan orang Melayu supaya kembali ke pangkuan UMNO. Kedua-dua pemimpin UMNO ini harus berhenti menggunakan kaum Cina dan penganut Kristian sebagai sasaran mudah untuk mencetuskan kebencian dan permusuhan terhadap rakyat Malaysia yang tidak bersalah.

Bagaimanakah seorang DPM dapat menjadi pemimpin sebuah negara sekiranya beliau mempunyai sifat perkauman yang tebal?

Mengikut laporan, Muhyiddin Yassin  telah menggunakan isu perkauman untuk meniup semangat ahli-ahli UMNO untuk mempertahankan bangsa, budaya dan institusi negara daripada Pakatan Rakyat (PR), di samping memfitnahkan DAP sebagai anti-Islam dan anti-Melayu. DAP mencabar Muhyiddin untuk membuktikan dakwaannya bahawa agenda DAP adalah untuk membentukkan sebuah negara republik. Ini adalah hasutan dan penipuan semata-mata!

Adakah Muhyiddin dan UMNO sudah ketandusan idea sampai apa-apa skandal kerajaan yang dibongkarkan DAP akan dianggap sebagai serangan terhadap kaum Melayu? Bukankah wang awam yang terbabit dalam skandal-skandal kewangan itu kepunyaan orang Melayu juga? Adakah cukup dengan pendekatan Muhyiddin yang mengaku dirinya Melayu dahulu dan rakyat Malaysia kemudian, sampai prinsip-prinsip demokrasi, integriti, amanah dan ketelusan semuanya boleh diabaikan begitu sahaja?

DAP percaya bahawa majoriti rakyat Malaysia, sama ada Melayu atau bukan Melayu, akan menolak hujah yang mewajarkan penipuan dan skandal kewangan atas nama perkauman, seperti dalam skandal lembu dan kondo mewah seorang Menteri UMNO, ataupun pendedahan Laporan Ketua Audit Negara 2010 tentang terlebihan belanja oleh jabatan-jabatan kerajaan sebanyak RM3.7 bilion.

DAP tidak pernah mengambil pendirian anti-Melayu atau anti-Islam. Kenaikan berkali-kali ganda peruntukan untuk hal-ehwal agama Islam di Pulau Pinang serta penerusan peruntukan untuk sekolah-sekolah agama yang telah ditamatkan oleh UMNO menjadi bukti bahawa DAP menghormati Islam dan adil kepada semua. Kerajaan Negeri Pulau Pinang tidak pernah mengusir walaupun sebuah rumah kampung Melayu. Satu-satunya rumah kampung Melayu yang pernah dirobohkan di Pulau Pinang telah diroboh oleh pemaju-kaitan-UMNO yang dipengerusikan seorang bekas ADUN UMNO.

Mungkin menjadi strategi politik yang berkesan bagi UMNO untuk mengambil pendirian anti-Cina, anti-India atau anti-Kristian, tetapi hanya parti yang ingin membunuh diri sahaja yang akan mengambil pendirian anti-Melayu atau anti-Islam. DAP tidak ingin membunuh diri tetapi komited ke arah perdamaian kebangsaan dan kerjasama antara semua.

Di manakah pendekatan sederhana yang dijanjikan konsep 1Malaysia Perdana Menteri, apabila Ketua Penerangan UMNO sendiri boleh mengugut Melayu dengan mengatakan bahawa mereka akan kehilangan hak kerana kononnya masyarakat Cina makin bertambah kuasa dari segi politik dan ekonomi, atau dengan mengatakan bahawa DAP tidak menghormati institusi raja kerana enggan menerima pingat atau darjah kebesaran yang membawa gelaran-gelaran seperti Datuk?

Pemimpin-pemimpin DAP tidak pernah mengejar gelaran-gelaran seperti Datuk, bukan macam pemimpin-pemimpin BN yang terhegeh-hegeh mengejarnya. Adakah ini bermakna kami tidak menghormati institusi Raja? Jika begitu, adakah mantan Timbalan Perdana Menteri Ghafar Baba juga seorang yang tidak menghormati institusi raja kerana allahyarham juga enggan menerima apa-apa gelaran semasa aktif berpolitik?

Tambahan pula, bagaimana masyarakat Cina boleh bertambah kuasa dari segi politik dan ekonomi apabila bilangan penjawat awam yang berbangsa Cina makin menurun? Di samping itu, masyarakat Cina sudah tidak lagi menguasai sektor-sektor ekonomi seperti perbankan, insuran, industri automobil, pembinaan, komunikasi dan pengangkutan.

Inilah pemimpin UMNO yang suatu hari kelak mungkin jadi pemimpin untuk rakyat Malaysia yang berbilang kaum?

Ahmad juga telah menyindir DAP sebagai "agen Kristian" kerana Ronnie Liu, Xavier, Elizabeth, Teresa Kok merupakan EXCO Kerajaan Negeri Selangor. Setelah disiasat berulang kali, pihak berkuasa sudah pun mengakui bahawa tidak ada berlaku sebarang penyebaran agama Kristian oleh DAP. Adakah seseorang itu tidak berlayak untuk menjadi ahli EXCO kerana beliau itu seorang penganut Kristian? Tambahan pula, Ronnie Liu bukan seorang penganut Kristian.

Tindakan Ahmad untuk mensasarkan kaum Cina dan penganut Kristian sebagai ancaman kepada orang Melayu adalah perbuatan yang tidak berbeza dengan taktik ketakutan yang digunakan oleh Hilter pada zaman Nazi di negara Jerman untuk mengekalkan kuasa mutlaknya sebagai diktator. Minoriti yang tidak bersalah di negara Jerman telah mengalami penderitaan di bawah pemerintahan Hitler. Adalah tidak berperikemanusiaan bagi UMNO untuk menggunakan penipuan dan fitnah yang serupa hanya untuk memenangi sokongan Melayu.

Iklim ketakutan, permusuhan dan kebencian yang digalakkan UMNO bukan sahaja bertentangan dengan 1Malaysia malah membinasakan perpaduan negara dan keharmonian kaum. Kita semua tahu kerosakan yang telah dibawa oleh Hitler kepada negara Jerman. Oleh itu, rakyat Malaysia hendaklah bersatu dalam pilihan raya umum yang akan datang untuk menghalang UMNO daripada melakukan kerosakan yang sama kepada negara Malaysia.

Mupok Aku

Taib Mahmud Plundering of Sarawak : Pulau Bruit Continued

Kuching
Wednesday, 8th December 2010

Revelations after revelations have been made by Sarawak Report but until now,  MACC has still not taking any action against the most corrupt and the longest serving Chief Minister in the world. What is Naijb waiting For? Is he waiting for this old man no longer in power? Or after he dies? 
Only God Knows...

Certain people in high places are given to alleging that the facts which have been published in Sarawak Report may not be true. Yet, the allegations we have published have been verifiable and documented.

Likewise, available to the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission in the government’s own register of companies, is the following irrefutable information. The company Mesti Bersatu is a major shareholder in Delta Padi Sdn Bhd, a venture that has caused shocking devastation on the mainly Melanau island of Pulau Bruit.

Also documented and verifiable is the fact that the Sarawak government has handed large tracts of land in Sungai Lengan on Pulau Bruit at minimal cost (RM78,000 for 100 hectares) to Delta Padi Sdn Bhd to develop a rice project, for which laughable levels of compensation have been offered to the Native Customary Landowners of the area. Pristine Mangrove forests have been destroyed over the past four years and the waters of the region have been polluted. Environmentalists are concerned that the development is now illegally encroaching also on the National Park on the island.

Mesti Bersatu, which is such a large shareholder in this enterprise, belongs to the Chief Minister of Sarawak, Abdul Taib Mahmud and members of his family. His name is printed in black and white as a key shareholder in the Register of Companies for all to see. This means that as the Head of Government he has been handing the land and development opportunities to himself.

Mesti Bersatu’s two partners in Delta Padi are Taib’s business crony Hii Yu Peng and the organisation Pelita, which belongs to Sarawak’s Land Custody and Development Authority (LCDA), of which Chief Minister Taib Mahmud is also the Chairman! This is all in black and white – there can be no argument.

It should be observed that the Sarawak Government has given these grants of valuable land to Delta Padi thanks to specific decisions by the Planning & Resources Minister and, of course, the Chairman of the LCDA. These key decision-making positions when it comes to the granting of land are both occupied by the Chief Minister, Abdul Taib Mahmud. Therefore, Taib has particularly used his position of direct authority over these departments to hand himself cheap land, which he had alienated from the native people. This is a clear case of conflict of interest, abuse of power and corruption.

Not just public land but also public money has been channelled into the Chief Minister’s company

However, it has not just land that Taib has been handing to himself through to Delta Padi Sdn Bhd. Both state and federal government money is also evidently being poured into supporting the venture, of which he and his family are such major shareholders. These resources will have been made available thanks, of course, to the decisions of Sarawak’s Finance Minister. Sarawak’s Finance Minister is also Abdul Taib Mahmud. This is another clear case of conflict of interest, abuse of power and corruption.

In an announcement to the news agency Bernama in 2004, the Minister James Masing explained the Sarawak Government’s policy towards the project – a policy that is spearheaded by the Chief Minister, Finance Minister, Land & Resources Minister and Chairman of the LCDA, who are all Abdul Taib Mahmud. The report quotes Masing:

Since Sarawak is basically in its early stage of rice production, subsidy must be provided for it to succeed.” He [Masing] said his ministry would act as the main co-ordinator between the various state and federal agencies and ministries involved in order for it to succeed.

He said under Phase One of its proposed development, a sum of RM19 million was needed for its irrigation system and he hoped the Federal Ministry of Agriculture could make the fund available soon. Masing said it had been estimated that about RM75 million was needed for the granary overall development……….

On the Delta Padi Plantation, he said since its inception seven years ago, a sum of RM18 million had been spent in its development. It had also invested RM8 million on its own rice milling facility the biggest in the country …. Masing said the state government would assist Delta Padi in dealing with its main rat and bird problems and in looking for more markets for its rice. He urged the national rice board or BERNAS to lend a helping hand”. [James Masing, Bernama 18/10/2004]

Corruption 

The above information is all verifyable to the Malaysian Government and the MACC  through the Register of Companies, their own official documents and ministerial announcements.  The  government auditors will be well-placed also to assess just how much Federal and State money has in total been poured into helping Delta Padi develop the project, in which the Chief Minister and his family hold a such a major shareholder  interest.  In this context they might like to consider how little of those substantial millions ave been spent in assisting the desperately poor Melanau and Iban populations of the area who have lost their fishing and hunting grounds and are suffering flooding and pollution as a result of the degradations and plantations on their Native Customary Lands? 

So what is not true? 


Therefore Sarawak Report would like to enquire on what basis BN commentators are to suggest that our accusations might be untrue and on what basis the MACC is refusing to investigate the State of Sarawak’s Chief Minister for abusing his powers to enrich himself and his family? Perhaps it is because it would appear that the members of the BN party have a highly undeveloped understanding of what forms corrupt practice?  In an interview recorded last week, Taib’s political ally, YB Karim Hamza, attempted to justify the Sarawak State Government’s current White Paper proposals to clamp down on media outlets like Sarawak Report, with a series of statements that have caused hilarity throughout Malaysia and abroad. 

While complaining that the reports on Taib’s wealth are not proven, Hamza’s simultaneously sought to justify it!   It would surely be “unfair” he argued for the Chief Minister not to be able to take up the “opportunities” provided by his office for example to buy “cheap land” if someone were to offer it to him? Hamza further articulated at length how public office is regarded by himself and fellow BN members not as an opportunity to serve the community, but as an opportunity to get into business at the same time and to make money from the “connections” that arise.  Mixing politics and business in such a way is essentially the dictionary definition of political corruption and Hamza has openly admitted to approving it. In the interview, which can be heard on Radio Free Sarawak via it’s website http://www.radiofreesarawak.org/  he frequently declares that it would not be “fair” if only businessmen and not politicians could be wealthy and “fly around in jets” and asserts that the families of politicians must of course be advantaged by using their resulting ‘network’ of connections.  He also slanderously implied that Prime Ministers in the UK and USA do the same and are “all filthy rich”. 

Since Abdul Taib Mahmud, who receives a modest official salary appropriate to the concept of public service, is clearly wealthy beyond imagination; since he puts endless government contracts the way of his family; since he demands large sums of money and shares from any business that seeks to gain a licence to operate in Sarawak and since he also flies around constantly in private jets, we can only conclude that the Chief Minister agrees one hundred percent with Hamza’s justifications of corruption. 

Favours to Delta Padi from Taib’s government departments 


It is clear that Mesti Bersatu’s involvement in the Delta Padi project forms one of the ‘business opportunities’ of the sort that YB Karim Hamza was referring to.  Crony business tycoon Hii Yu Peng evidently provided the Chief Minister with an ‘opportunity’ to take a stake in his venture to turn the Native Customary Rights Lands on the pristine island of Bruit into a paddy project. 


Mr Hii Yu Peng has of course put in most of the private capital into the venture, true to the pattern of all Taib’s dealings with local towkeys in search of land and licences, which he totally controls.  Indeed it is extremely unlikely that the Taib family company Mesti Bersatu has contributed a single penny to Delta Paddy in return for the quarter of all the shares that they have acquired. 
A further quarter of the shares are in the hands of the state agency Pelitia, most likely pending a suitable time for their ‘privatisation’ into the Taib family clutches, after the need for more state funding has passed (keep reading Sarawak Report for further evidence on this practice). 

In return for this private investment by Hii, the State Government and in particular the LCDA department of which Taib is Chairman, has granted an eye-watering level of ‘opportunities’ to Delta Padi.  These ‘opportunities’ also noticeably escalated in the aftermath of the incorporation of Mesti Bersatu in May 2007 and its involvement in the Delta Padi project. Sarawak Reports researches have now identified the following plots mainly in ulau Bruit, as having been handed to Delta:

(1)  3 plots in Sungai Lengan, Sibu (acquired 2005 – 2010) amounting to 100  hectares for a bargain  basement RM78,000 

(2) 6 plots in Batang Lebaan, Sibu (acquired 2007) amounting to 2,000 for  RM2.5 million 

(3) 2 plots in Sungai Buloh (acquired 1999) amounting to around 300 hectares  for nothing. 

(4) 4 plots in Serendeng Sarikei (acquired 2009 and 2010) amounting to 1,000 hectares for a give-away RM700,000 

(5) 2 plots in Tulai Meradong (acquired 2008) amounting to about 400  hectares for RM310,000

(6) 4 plots in Paloh (acquired 2000-2005) amounting to around 7,700 hectares between 1998-2008 for roughly RM 2.75 million

(7) 1 plot in Mukah (2008) of 5,000 hectares for RM 2.5 million.

Coming to court 

The recent extension of the lands handed to the Delta Padi venture has now sparked a legal action by 8 Native Iban villages, who will be represented by the human rights lawyer and PKR leader of Sarawak Baru Bian.  Mr Bian will most likely be surprised to discover that he is to be challenging the Chief Minister himself in this civil case, as locals were misleadingly informed that the company behind the Delta Padi project was Rimbunam Hijau, presumably in a mishandled attempt to hide Taib’s involvement. Sarawak Report is wondering when such civil cases against the Chief Minister will finally give way to more appropriate criminal cases in the Federal Courts of Malaysia, given the evidence of this and numerous other cases of corruption by BN in Sarawak?

To all Sarawakians let's Pray to God so that this old man receive his earthly  punishment soonest.. 

Karpal accuses Najib Razak and Rosmah Mansor of being Sodomy II masterminds

KUALA LUMPUR
Thursday, 18th February 2010

Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim’s lawyer accused Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak and his wife Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor today of masterminding the sodomy charge being faced by the Opposition Leader.

“As I said, there’s a black hand in this trial, and that is the hand of the present Prime Minister..there are two hands and one is of his wife,” Karpal Singh told the court today.

Anwar echoed Karpal’s accusations by shouting from the dock the words “conspiracy, blatant lies.”

Karpal's accusations was the latest allegation flung by the defence against the PM and his wife, in what appears to be an attempt to link them to an alleged "political conspiracy."

Both Najib and Rosmah has been listed down as witnesses the defence wants to call during the trial.

Karpal (pic) was addressing the court soon after the sodomy trial resumed today after he failed in his bid to disqualify High Court judge Datuk Zabidin Mohd Diah from presiding over the case.

Karpal had wanted to disqualify the judge because of dissatisfaction with the way the court had dealt with Utusan Malaysia’s coverage of the trial.

The veteran lawyer has been unrelenting in his onslaught on the judge by citing what he claimed were examples of the judge’s lack of objectivity with regards to an Utusan Malaysia report on the trial published at the beginning of Saiful Bukhari’s questioning by the prosecution.

Zabidin, in summing up his decision, said he did not see any reason why he should recuse himself from the case.

“If I were to step down from this trial, I would be running away from my responsibility as a judge who has taken an oath of office,” said Zabidin.

Karpal gave notice to the court that Anwar’s defence team would be filing an application for appeal against the decision of the judge not to recuse himself from hearing the trial.

He also urged that the trial go on and the defence team be allowed to cross-examine Saiful, and that there be no more delays.

“Accusations of delay tactics by the defence must be cleared from people’s minds,” said Karpal to the court.

At this point, Solicitor-General 2 Datuk Mohd Yusof Zainal Abiden replied by stating that neither the prosecution nor the judge had ever accused the defence of utilising delay tactics in the trial.

Karpal then retorted by saying that some media organisations had been doing so.

“We are prepared to carry on. There have been demonstrations, too many things going, like the protest at the Australian Embassy.

“We don’t want a repetition of it and Pemuda Umno cannot be allowed to run wild.”

Yusof, on the other hand, stressed that the trial must continue as the defence and the prosecution owed it to the Malaysian public, not the Australians, to do so.

The judge decided, however, to adjourn the trial until March 25 pending the appeal to the Court of Appeal.

The 62-year-old Anwar is accused of sodomising Saiful at the Desa Damansara Condominium here on June 26, 2008. Anwar has denied the charge, the second time in 12 years he has faced similar charges.

The former deputy prime minister has vehemently denied the accusations hurled by Saiful, describing them as “evil, frivolous lies by those in power” when the charge was read out to him. He is charged under section 377B of the Penal Code and can be sentenced to a maximum of 20 years’ jail and whipping upon conviction. The trial is taking place 18 months after Anwar was charged in August 2008.

Anwar was charged with sodomy and corruption in 1998 after he was sacked from the Cabinet and was later convicted and jailed for both offences. He was freed in September 2004 and later resurrected his political career by winning back his Permatang Pauh parliamentary seat in a by-election in 2008, which had been held in the interim by his wife.

He had earlier led the opposition coalition, Pakatan Rakyat, to a historic sweep of five states and 82 parliamentary seats in Election 2008.

Mupok Aku

Agi Idup Agi Ngelaban