Remaung6renjer

Nuffnang

Showing posts with label NCR Land. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NCR Land. Show all posts

Sunday, April 14, 2013

Pilihan Raya Umum Ke-13 (PRU13) - Bakani Ka Narit Undi Iban-Dayak Bagi Ke-1

Sunday, 14th April 2013
Kuantan, Pahang


Kitai Iban-Dayak Mesti Berani Ngelaban Raja Sarawak Tu!
Enti ka boleh sokong ari orang Rumah Panjai, orang ti kempen ke parti PR mesti oleh convince orang rumah panjai Lalu nunjuk ke tanda tu ngagai orang BN.


Kitai Iban tauka bansa Dayak ke bukai patut ia baka maia ke diatu udah nemu diri dikelinyai perintah Barisan Nasional. Kitai ukai semina tinggal ari pemansang menoa, pelajar tauka penatai pemisi tang utai ti pemadau berega tauka pengaya ba kitai ianya tanah kitai baka tanah pemuda serta tanah ti endor kitai berumah pan abis dirampas perintah Taib Mahmud. Nya alai enti kitai enggai agi diperinsa perintah BN maia pengawa bepilih ke sekali tu meh kitai muai sida. Nya alai aram kitai kelebih agi bala Iban-Dayak ti diau di Sarawak ngerembai ke utai ti ditulis aku tu ngagai bala aki-inek, apai-indai,bala menyadi serta kaban ti diau di menoa pesisir awak ke menoa kitai Sarawak ke sekali tu dipegai parti Pakatan Rakyat (PR).
 
Baka ke selama tiap-tiap hari maia pulai bekerja aku selalu bejako dalam talipaun enggau indai aku nanya ke berita serta pengerai ia. Dua-tiga ari ke lepas aku bisi limpang mimit nanya ia pasal pengawa bepilih di menua kami di Empaling, Sg Tenggang. Utai ti ditanya aku nya pasal pengawa kempen oleh parti-parti BN tauka PR serta enggau tunga sokong orang menua kami. Baka pilihanraya ke udah mega nitih ke padah indai aku nadai bisi orang udah kempen ngagai menoa kami baik ari BN tauka PR. Pia mega ari segi sokong, nitih ke padah indai aku orang di menua kami endang rata-rata sigi agi nyukong "Perintah". Nya alai enti baka PR ka bulih sukong ari bala ke diau di rumah panjai dua perkara tu mesti diperati ka ianya pengawa kempen serta bakani ko kitai ka ngakis mentaliti "BN=Perintah" ari orang ke diau di rumah panjai.
 
Orang Iban-Dayak Sanggup diau ba rumah panjai ti baka tu ari ti ngelaban "Perintah " BN!

Pengawa kempen ngagai rumah panjai mesti di atur enggau manah serta "logistic support" baka Public Address (PA) system mesti cukup. Enti kempen semina nganjong batang tuboh aja nama guna. Anang ngumbai orang rumah panjai nadai "first impression" leboh ti meda penatai orang ti kempen. Ari pengawa kempen ke bisi dipejalai ke bala kami maia pilihanraya DUN Sarawak 2011 tu tadi aku meda kempen ti dipejalai ke nadai bisi sistematik serta logistic support ti cukop. Bala sida PA, power supply tauka generator pan nadai bisi. Uji kitai empu nyadi penerima bala kempen ti baka kami sebuat nya tadi nama first impression kita? Setuju. Kita mesti nadai bisi confident meda bala ke datai kempen. Enti udah kempen pan nadai digaga enggau manah bakani ko bala orang rumah panjai deka ngundi kitai. Nya alai baka ngenang pengawa kempen kami nyin tadi maioh orang datai ngulu tang maia bepilih semina 2 tauka 3 iko aja ti bisi ngundi pengari kami.
Pia mega siti agi utai ti beguna amai maia kempen ngagai rumah panjai tu strategi. Baka ngenang pengawa kempen  kami sebuat nyin tadi, nadai bisi strategi. Utai ti deka dikejako ke tak nitih ke utai ti bisi dalam ontak lalu sebarang pansut aja. Sepatut ia bala ti kempen mesti bisi udah besedia ari segi isu tauka utai ti deka dipansut ke. Enti baka orang ti sepatut ia nyadi ke cunto kempen, aku berasai rindu meda cara menyadi kitai ari Parti Democratic Action Party (DAP) berkempen. Sapa-sapa ti kala nitih ke ceramah parti DAP tu mesti besetuju enggau aku. Parti DAP tiap-tiap ceramah sida utai ti pemadu manahnya ari segi   logistic Support sida. Sida deka beguna ke PA serta stage ti manah siap enggau projector. Pia mega baka isu tauka buah jako ti dipantai ke sida tau narit bala pengundi. Nama kebuah kitai Iban-Dayak enda oleh nitih ke penemu DAP ari segi bekempen?
Peda Gaya orang DAP berkempen. Uji kita bekempen ngagai rumah panjai bakatu!
 
Pekara ke-dua ti deka dipansut ke aku ke  sekali tu ianya pasal orang rumah panjai ti nganggap BN tu tadi perintah. Sekali pandang ko orang Laut kitai selalu nyalah orang rumah panjai taja pan nemu diri dikelinyai ke BN tang agi mega deka ngundi BN. Di menoa endor aku bekerja ditu pan orang masih nganggap orang "Sarawak bodoh" laban ti nyadi kubu-kuat BN tajapan ari segi pemansang Sarawak jauh tinggal. Tang enti kitai meda ke belakang sokong kitai Iban-Dayak, dia kitai deka nemu Iban-Dayak tu ari segi politik endang kuat. Tang kitai Iban-Dayak majak lemi ari segi politik udah Insiden Ming Court dititih ke PBDS masuk BN serta pengujung parti PBDS tu ditutup. Maia PBDS agi kuat ngari ke kitai Iban-Dayak, kitai Iban di rumah panjai endang sigi kuat amai nyukong PBDS laban parti tu endang ngering ke kitai Iban-Dayak. Maia PBDS agi nyadi pembangkang di peringkat DUN lalu enggau BN di Parlimen, Taib Mahmud nadai berani negu tanah kitai Iban-Dayak. Lalu kitai Iban-Dayak semakin lemi dalam politik udah PBDS masuk BN. Lalu pia mega maia PBDS agi nyadi pembangkang rumah panjai kitai Iban diukum Taib nadai diberi pemansang. Nya alai maia tu maioh amai rumah panjai kitai Iban putus. Uji kitai meda menoa ke sebelah tisi jalai ti maioh putus semua ia ketegal PBDS ti nyadi pembangkang lalu masuk dalam BN baru. Nya alai kitai Iban ti diau di rumah panjai sampai ke diatu agi fobia nadai diberi pemansang oleh Taib Mahmud serta takut nadai ngundi "parti perintah" BN. Taja sida ngundi BN tang ukai nya reti iya sida rindu ke BN. Nya alai enti baka PR deka menang undi orang rumah panjai, maia kempen mesti kempen betul-betul, cukup sedia ari segi "logistic support" serta isu ti deka dipansut ke. Ngena simpati baka jako madah ke PR nadai duit tauka ngumpul derma ari orang maioh engka efektif di nengeri (bandar)  tang enti kempen ngagai rumah panjai strategi tu nadai tau dikena. Sapa-sapa ti kempen ngagai rumah panjai mesti oleh "convince" orang rumah panjai sida ia cukup duit serta utai bukai dikena niri ke perintah. Enti PR deka berdiri di tempat-tempat majoriti Iban-Dayak sida mesti bersedia ari segi "logistic Support". strategi serta  duit. Enti nadai ketiga-tiga utai tu tadi, manah agi PR anang ngelaban terus laban enti nadai cukup besedia tu deka nambah ke pengerosak politik orang Iban-Dayak.
Lalu naka tu dulu buah karang aku ke sekali tu. Ba bagi ti deka datai akau deka nyebut isu ti tau dikena PR kena kempen ngelaban BN di rumah panjai.

Mupok Aku


 

Friday, December 28, 2012

How Taib Mahmud's Government Robs The Native Of Their NCR Lands

Friday, 28th December 2012
Kuantan, Pahang

Explosive Revelation by DAP MP on How Taib Mahmud and his gang of thugs Robbed the Native of their NCR Lands. But where are all the Dayak Politicians?
 
 
KUCHING: Seventy Selakau families in Kampung Kendaie in Lundu, some 150km from here, have claimed that they have been cheated of their lands. The families participated in a joint venture agreement with Rimbunan Hijau oil plantation company and state government agency, Land Custody Development Authority (LCDA).
 
Revealing this, Sarawak DAP secretary Chong Chieng Jen said: “In the course of the joint venture arrangement, the people have suffered triple whammy (exploited three times).
 
“Firstly, they were cheated of their native customary rights land which is about 2,000 acres plus. After a perimeter survey, their NCR land was reduced to 1,000 plus. And the government told them that the remainder of the land had become state land.” Chong, who is also the MP for Bandar Kuching said..
 
Secondly the local people were cheated of jobs. “The plantation company offered them RM15 a day. If they worked full time for 30 days, they would only get RM450 per month with a one day rest for the following month. “When the NCR land owners refused to work, they were branded as lazy, and as a substitute the oil palm company brought in cheap foreign workers. They were paid lower. This is the ultimate exploitation,” Chong said.

He said that the third layer of exploitation was when the landowners were paid approximately RM200 per acre per year. “Based on international price of palm oil last year, the nett profit of oil palm plantation company was RM200 per acre per month. “And yet the landowners under the joint venture scheme of the government were paid RM200 per acre per year. All the other profits of the 11 months of the year went to the plantation company. “That is what I call a triple whammy exploitation,” he said, pointing out that the government had failed the people under this joint venture agreement.
 
Income inequality Chong said LCDA, as a government agency, was supposed to protect the interest of the NCR landowners. He said the villagers had nobody to turn to and their complaints to the authorities fell on deaf ears. “I think the government’s so-called joint venture scheme for the development of NCR land is so lopsided. It only benefits the plantation companies at the expense of the NCR land owners. “That is why the income inequality is such a huge problem in Sarawak’s economy.

They do not get their rightful income from their land,” he said. Chong’s advice to those who are yet to sign their joint venture agreement is for them to wait until after the election when the Pakatan Rakyat formed the next government. “Under our alternative budget for 2011, we have allocated RM100 million to develop about 100,000 acres as a pilot project.
 
“For NCR land owners, if we become the next government we will come out with RM100 million to develop 100,000 NCR land and provide necessary equipment including seedlings required to carry out the plantation. “At the end of the day all the proceeds from the sale from these plantations will go solely to the land owners,” he said adding that the Pakatan government would not do business.

To all the natives, the choice is yours whether all of you still want to get cheated by BN thugs or to choose the Pakatan Rakyat who will set aside the RM100 million to develop your lands....Remaung6Renjer 



Mupok Aku

Saturday, October 8, 2011

Masing Introduces Another New Land Development Concept To Cheat Iban of their NCR Lands

Kuching
Saturday, 8th October 2011

After failure miserably with the "New Land Development Concept or Konsep Gaya Baru" Masing has came up with a new concept to develop the NCR Land. Being the owner of the NCR land that had been cheated of my lands I am advising Masing to do not gamble our land..our most precious assets!


As reports in most of the local newspaper today, the Land Development Ministry is considering four alter-native models to ensure a productive development of native customary rights (NCR) land.

The four models are leasing, profit-sharing and nucleus out-growers (private sector driven), and management and profit-sharing (government-led).

The four models were recommended by the Government Transformation Programme (GTP) Sabah-Sarawak Lab held last year.

Minister Tan Sri Dr James Masing said the alternative models were being considered because response from landowners under the new concept of NCR development introduced in 1994 had been luke- warm.

Masing said " After more than 10 years of implementing the concept, it has brought unsatisfactory result.So we are considering the alternative models because we want it to benefit all the stakeholders in the land development. The ministry is serious in eradicating rural poverty and this can only be done if the land is productive.

Under the new concept, a joint venture to develop NCR land is formed between the private sector as investor owning 60% of the share, the landowners who own 30% and the managing agent representing the government and the rights of the participating landowners who holds 10% for a 60 years period.

However, as of April 30 this year, only 55,988 hectares of land had been developed into oil palm plantation under the concept by 38 joint companies.

The lukewarm response was due to the low dividend paid out to the participating landowners and not on time too due to the high gearing involved as the investor had to source for the necessary fund to develop the project without any public fund.

Masing said besides oil palm, rubber would also be seriously considered as an alternative crop to be planted.

“This is because rubber is more prominent now because it is a high price commodity now,” he added.

Masing might get the wrong information. The failure of the New Concept lies on following reasons :-
(1) 60 years period is considered as too long for the JV.
(2) Unfairly JV distribution wheras the land owners only own 30%
(3) The JV has never bring any profits therefore had failed to eradicate poverty among land owners
(4) The land owner has no say in term of administration and business decision of the JV
(5) Anything gone wrong with the project, the owner of the NCR lands will lose their lands.
To Masing, please keep your mouth shut if it is only meant to destroy the dayak and to rob us of our NCR  Lands.
Bukittunggal.Com

Mupok Aku


Sunday, June 26, 2011

DAP Exposes Taib's Evil Doing In DUN

Kuching
Sunday, 26th June 2011

Wong Ho Leng Demands Explanation Why Government Lands Were Awarded To Taib's Brother.


The votes that they gave to Masing and the rest of the Iban YB From BN in the Just Concluded State Election have been used to Rob their NCR Lands but with Wong Hong Leng and the rest of DAP YB presence in the August House, the Iban can now be assured that  Masing and the rest of  Iban Lanun will not be able to rob their NCR lands easily....www.Bukittunggal.Com

Eventhought BN Nasional managed to defend Sarawak and obtained more that two third majority, but with more DAP assemblymen presence this time round the DUN Sitting is not going to be an easy ride for BNs' Assemblymen.
So far I am really proud with all the DAP Assemblymen who have been asking questions and condemned  the Barisan Nasional especially with matter related to Iban's interests. Whether they are aware or not that they are being betrayed by their dayak assemblymen but with DAP assemblymen around the dayak especially the Iban whose NCR lands have been subjected to the JV can now rely on DAP's assemlymen to protect their most valuable assets the NCR Land...hopefully.
Please see the article cited from Free Malaysiakini about Hong Ho Leng from DAP demanded explanation from the August House why the land in Sibu which was first acquired by the non-bumiputera own company but at the end was given to Taib Mahmud's brother in 2007.

Bukit Assek state assemblyperson Wong Ho Leng has demanded to know why a huge parcel of land was alienated to a company owned by Chief Minister Abdul Taib Mahmud's brother, Ibrahim, and Sibu Municipal Council (SMC) chairman Tiong Thai King.
Wong, also Sarawak state legislative assembly opposition leader, said Ibrahim and Tiong, who is also Lanang member of parliament, are already "multi billionaires".
The 3,000-acre land should have been alienated to PJ Green Field Sdn Bhd, a reputable agriculture company, and not to Victoria Square Development Sdn Bhd, he said.
He added that PJ Green Field Sdn Bhd with some 90 farmers had applied for the alienation of the land located at the south of Loba Kabong forest reserve, about 9km northwest of Sibu town, for mixed crop agricultural development.

Wong (above) was speaking yesterday during the debate on the motion of thanks after Yang di-Pertua Negeri Abang Muhamad Salahuddin Abang Barieng's opening address.
"The proposed area is classified as a mixed zone land.
"The company proposed to plant mandarin oranges, coffee and aloe vera," he said, adding that these agriculture activities will create employment and rejuvenate the entire west bank of Batang Igan.
Big dreams, big plans, big letdown
The application, dated Nov 28, 2003, was rejected in October 2006.
Wong said the company then learnt that the land in question was alienated as Lot 63 Block 6 Engkilo Land District to Victoria Square Development Sdn Bhd in April 2007.
He said: "Why are people of different spectrum treated differently? The land ought to be given to the farmers."
He added that on Dec 12, 2007, slightly over a year later, PJ Green Field was informed that the land that they had applied for was likely subject to native customary rights .
"This is a lie. How can native customary rights not be determinable by 2007?
"Above all else, how could this land be likely subject to native customary rights when it could be alienated to Victoria Square Development Sdn Bhd eight months earlier?" he asked.
Wong asked Taib, who is also the minister of planning and resource management, to inform the House whether political reasons underlay the alienation exercise.
He said the government should encourage reputable farmers to apply for agriculture land, since there are so much suitable state reserve land available.
"I have said before in this House that our state must encourage agricultural activities as well as diversify," he said, adding that the state must spread into other agriculture sectors and not just focus on oil palm alone as the international price of palm oil fluctuates.

Mupok Aku



Friday, June 17, 2011

NCR Land Robbery By BN Government: Masing Will Leads The Rest Of The Dayak YBs To Amend Sarawak Land Code

Kuching
Friday, 17th June 2011


BN's Government Sarawak Strikes back at NCR land owners. This is the price that the dayak has to pay for Voting for BN in the previous State Election.

The Top Iban traitor: He leads the rest of the Dayak YBs in Robbing Iban of their NCR Lands!

Land Development Minister James Masing says he will table an amendment bill to plug the loopholes in the present ordinance.

The Sarawak state government is striking back at the native customary rights (NCR) land owners after it lost a court battle in the Pantu land case.

Land Development Minister James Masing (right) said today he will table the Land Custody and Development Authority (Amendment) Bill 2011, which seeks to plug the loopholes in the LCDA Ordinance.

He confirmed that the amendments to the LCDA Ordinance arise out of the Pantu land case in which High Court judge justice Linton Albert made a damning judgment against the state government, state-owned LCDA and Pelita Holdings Sdn Bhd over the principle deed signed with a group of NCR landowners claiming native customary rights to the land.

“We can't have a decision that affects the investors' confidence. We need to protect those who have invested huge sums of money in the oil palm plantations,” he said.


If  through  Politic cannot protect our NCR Lands,the Iban should consider going  to the Street "Ngauay"!


He said landowners who have signed the development agreements cannot later on withdraw from the NCR land development, once the amendments come into force.

“They have to stick to the agreement,” Masing, who is also the Parti Rakyat Sarawak (PRS) president, insisted.

NCR land law expert See Chee How said the tabling of the Bill showed that the government does not believe in the court's decisions.

See, who is also the PKR Batu Lintang state assemblyperson, said the Bill should not have retrospective effect.

“Yes, your suspicion is right that the tabling of the Bill has something to do with the Pantu land case,” he said when contacted.

The Bill, to be tabled at the next week's meeting of the Sarawak state legislative assembly, seeks to spell out more clearly the functions, role and responsibilities of LCDA in regard to the development of land declared as a development area.

The Bill, under clause 3, seeks to define a company formed by LCDA and whose controlling shares are held by LCDA as “native” for the purposes of the Sarawak Land Code.

The state government and LCDA lost in the Pantu land case because the court ruled that the joint company formed by LCDA was not a native under the Sarawak Land Code.

This is what Masing meant as plugging the legal loopholes in the LCDA Ordinance.

But the far-reaching consequences of the Bill is on the introduction of Clause 7 which seeks to amend Section 12 of the Principle Ordinance to empower LCDA or any person authorised by LCDA, to enter upon and remain on land within a development area, where development agreements have been signed.

In undertaking development of the land in a development area, LCDA acts as the agent of the government. Thus, the provisions of Section 29 of the Government Proceedings Act, 1956, should apply to LCDA.
 Ki

In Ten Years to Come If We Still Vote For  BN, the Iban will have no land for their own Used. Ask Masing How Much Dividend Has Been Paid By Tetangga Akrab or now Kim Loong!

The section prohibits the court to grant any injunction or order of possession against a government, or its public officer or agent.

Any disputes or differences concerning any development agreement will be referred to mediation, and if it fails, to arbitration.

Such requirements will be deemed to have been incorporated into any development agreement signed before or after the date of coming into force of the proposed amendments.

The Bill states that the new proposals are intended to facilitate the resolution of disputes between the parties to the development agreements, including the owners of NCR land, in an amicable manner.

In the Pantu Land case, the court attacked a joint-venture agreement (JVA) between Pelita Holdings Sdn Bhd (PHSB) and a plantation company, Tetangga Arkab Sdn Bhd (TASB) and Tetangga Arkab Pelita (Pantu) Sdn Bhd (Tetangga).

Tetangga is the joint venture company formed by PHSB and TASB that undertook the development of an oil palm plantation project involving the NCR land in Pantu district.

The principle deed and the JVA were signed on Sept 3, 2004 for the development of 7,000ha of NCR land.

Twelve NCR landowners have sued the Land Custody and Development Authority (LCDA), PHSB, Tetangga and the state government as first, second, third and four defendants respectively.

PHSB is a wholly subsidiary of LCDA, a state government land agency.

The plaintiffs are Masa Nangkai, Christopher Ambu, Engkana Talap, Sinju Senabong, Uban Bundan, Albert Waler Skinner Tulis, Jacob Emang, Len Jubang, Liap Giling, Ivanhoe Anthony Belon, Morice Renggi and Gima Belon.

They were suing on behalf of themselves and 90 other occupiers, holders and claimants of NCR land situated at or around Kampung Tekuyong, Kampung Dadak Aping, Kampung Aping, Kampung Lubok Abok, Kampung Sungai Tenggang, Kampung Limau and Kampung Pantu.

The plaintiffs claimed various declaratory reliefs relating to their native customary rights over land in the disputed area land which was established to be within the oil palm plantation project and for restraining orders against LCDA, PHSB and Tetangga and for them to give vacant possession of the plaintiffs' native customary rights land and damages.

'Fig leaves too scanty to conceal violations'

In his judgment, Justice Albert said the principle deed and the JVA had deprived the plaintiffs of their native customary rights land which was a source of their livelihood and lost the rights to their property which were violations of Articles 5 and 13 of the constitution.

“Irrespective of the cleverly-devised legal mechanism and legalistic language which constituted the principal deed and the joint-venture agreement, they are mere fig leaves too scanty to
conceal their violations of Articles 5 and 13 of the constitution because the sum total of the rights of the landowners, to put it crudely, and for want of a better word, is zero,” Albert had said.

He said this was patently demonstrated by the following aspects of the principal deed which was briefly set out for emphasis and at the risk of repetition.

Firstly, PHSB was to receive and collect the benefits of the development of the native customary rights land into an oil palm plantation, not the landowners;
Secondly, the commercial development of the native customary rights land into an oil palm plantation was to be carried out by a joint venture company formed by PHSB and TASB, a
company exclusively chosen by PHSB under a joint-venture agreement in respect of which the landowners are not even a party to.
Thirdly, the native customary rights lands are immediately amalgamated and title is to be issued in the name of the 'joint venture' company and the landowners would have no beneficial legal equitable or caveatable interest in the land to be issued with title.

“And one can go on and on to illustrate how the terms of the principal deed have stripped the landowners of their rights in every conceivable way and reduced those rights into nothingness.

“The fact that the landowners were not parties to the agreement between PHSB and TASB, under which it was agreed for the commercial development of the native customary rights land by Tetangga, meant that the landowners' rights in and over the oil palm plantation was also definitively zero.

The judge said the JVA was also in contravention of Section 8 of the Land Code because neither TASB nor Tetangga had been declared a native at the time of the JVA and it did not matter that Tetangga was subsequently declared a native because it is a principle of antiquity that things invalid from the beginning cannot be made valid by a subsequent act.

Sunday, February 20, 2011

Helpless NCR Landowner Bashed-Up By Loggers Were Detained By Police

Kuching
Sunday, 20th February 2011


SARIKEI, 14 Feb 2011: Minggat anak Nyakin, who has a parcel of NCR land at Sungai Rotan and Sungai Penyaru Kuba (Kiba) Sarikei, found out the hard and painful way that standing up for his rights is no easy task and could cost him his life.

Lying in Sarekei Hospital after being viciously attacked while checking on alleged illegal logging activity on his NCR land, Mingat has to now deal with being under police remand for trespassing.
Said Ngumbang Anak Barau of the Tahabas (native landowners Network): “Not only was he (Mingat) badly beaten up, he was also arrested by the police.

“Mingat and his son Juan went to their land to check on illegal logging. When they found out there was still logging going on, they tried to talk to the manager but instead were attacked.”


Helpless Minggat Lying in a Hospital in Sarikei....

According to Ngumbang, the incident occurred on Feb 14.

In December 2010, Mingat reported alleged illegal logging over his land to the police, the Land and Survey Department as well as the Public Works Department and called for an investigation.
On the day of the incident, Mingat and Juan had decided to check on the situation. Upon finding continued logging activity, they decided to drop in at the log-pond and tried negotiating for compensation with its manager.
Iban nowadays has been perceived by others as coward, weak and disunited who can be easily robbed of  NCR lands. If Indian has HINDRAF and Malay with PERKASA why can't we form-up a radical movement that will defend our rights such as the NCR lands and other rights that we are  entitled to under the constitution....Bukittunggal 
The negotiation went sour and before Minggat and his son could leave the office building, they were attacked viciously at its footsteps.


Iban should not just keep quiet when our people being robbed of their NCR Lands. Let's Unite under one umbrella and chase those NCR robbers from our land!


“Although badly hurt, his son managed to escape in the darkness towards a nearby oil palm plantation, while his father was left  in an unconscious state at the footsteps of the log-pond manager’s office.
“Regardless of any wrongdoings or crimes that Minggat or his son may have committed, the source of the problem has yet to be investigated satisfactorily by the authorities.
“Minggat’s family agrees that Minggat should be fairly investigated, and so does the timber company that has been operating for many years on NCR lands allegedly without a relevant or valid licence.
“The alleged illegal logging seems to be proceeding unhindered thus far.
“A police report has been lodged by Minggat’s wife on Feb 16 regarding the attack. The attackers have not been arrested,” he said.
“The name of the timber company which owns the log-pond remains unknown to the rest of us, while there is no telling when investigations will be made on Minggat and his son’s attackers.
“What is certain is that Minggat and Juan will remain hospitalised for a few more days or even weeks.
“Today, their pains are too debilitating for them to even ponder what they will do next.” Ngumbang added.


This article was originally published in Free Malaysia Today on 19 February 2011


Thursday, January 20, 2011

Lets Chase Dayak Away (LCDA) By Cobbold John

Kuching
Wednesday, 19th Jan 2010




Lets Chase Dayak Away (LCDA)

At first glance I thought the book which is authored by one of the Iban philanthropist cum politician from Balai Ringin Saudara Cubbold John is an anti-dayak book.
But after finishing reading the book I discovered that it was about the systematic robbery of  the NCR lands by  by The Sarawak Land Custody and Development Authority (LCDA), and how a group of Iban from Sg. Tenggang fought their way out to defend their NCR lands from being robbed by the government agency that was created by Taib Mahmud and Jabu Numpang.

The book is divided into 31 chapters namely :

Chapter 1. Let's Chase Dayak Away (LCDA)

Chapter 2. What happen to the Dayak leaders

Chapter 3. Deadly Battle over NCR Lands in Pantu

Chapter 4. Ancient Graves of Forefathers completely Destroyed

Chapter 5. Harvesting Oil Palm Fruits From their Own NCR Land

Chapter 6. NCR Land owners in Ubah Pantu Getting Ready to go to Court Battle

Chapter 7. United We Dayak Stand

Chapter 8. Malaysia Day Robbery (September 16th, 2009)

Chapter 9. The Dayaks are Not Criminals

Chapter 10. Police Impersonator Strikes  Again

Chapter 11. Illegal Possession Of Native Customary Land

Chapter 12. Erecting of Illegal Structure On Public Road

Chapter 13. Gawai "Thanks Giving"  2009

Chapter 14. Dayak Against Dayak

Chapter 15. Finally Blood Is  Shed on NCR Land

Chapter 16. Dis-empowerment of the Natives

Chapter 17. Intrusion Into NCR Land Getting Serious

Chapter 18 Pelita will use the Penghulus and Tuai Rumahs.

Chapter 19. Tajem Urges Government of the day to Review Native Law

Chapter 20. Ubah Pantu NCR Land Owners At Risk of Losing Their Lands

Chapter 21. MACC Please Help Us

Chapter 22. The Brooke Government Has Surveyed Our NCR Land In Ubah Pantu

Chapter 23. The NCR Landowners of Pantu Going to High Court

Chapter 24. Three Dayak Farmers  Arrested By The Police For the Fourth Time

Chapter 25. Why Does Kim Loong Berhad Continue to Harass the Dayak Farmers

Chapter 26. Public Harassment and Illegal Arrest and Police Reports

Chapter 27. Abok Farmers Harvesting Oil Palm Fruits at their NCR Lands Arrested

Chapter 28. At the High Court Kuching June 7th 2010

Chapter 29. High Court Hearing Continues, August 9th now back to Sri Aman again

Chapter 30. The cries of the Interverners

Chapter 31. Trip to Kuching Again


Who Should Read This Book


This book is a compilation of the articles from dayak nation, broken shield and Bukittunggal to name a few , about the Iban struggle in defending their NCR lands out and inside the court and the explanation on the gaya baru JV of oil palm between land owners, LCDA and government appointed company.
This book thus must be read by all the Dayaks who own most of the NCR lands in Sarawak which have been affected by Taib Mahmud Politic of  Development.


Where and How  to Get the Book


As saudara Cubbold put it, at this moment the book is not for sale. But for those who would like to own the book can call saudara cubbold at Dayak Nation.

Mupok Aku

Monday, November 22, 2010

NCR Land Owners Warn Pelita and Kim Loong To Return their NCR Lands or Else

Kuching
Sunday, 21st November 2010




Note: Bukit Tunggal is  at the background of the photo.... 

On 3rd September 2004 the land owners from several longhouses namely Munggu Ubah, Tekuyong, Empaling,Isu and Gayau were misled by the BN representatives for Bukit Bengunan and Sri Aman to sign the JV for oil palm plantation with Pelita and Tetangga Akrab Sendirian Berhad.
Today after of  more than six years the JV had been signed, the land owners were only  been paid with the advance bonus for less than RM 1000 per hectare. This is equivalent to less than RM 170 per hectare per year.
Today as I went back to kampong Empaling, one of the longhouse that participates in the JV, almost all the land owners indicated that they were not happy with the JV.

One of the land owner John Ade (photo left)  told Bukittunggal that if he did not participate with the JV, with rubber current price he believed that his 1.3 hectares  rubber plantation could produce more than RM 1000 per month, meaning that he had lost about RM 72000 in six years.
But he is not the only NCR land owner that losing substantial income as a result of the JV. Bukittunggal family also losing more than RM1K per month as a result of the JV. 
But where are the BN YBs that had persuaded and influenced  them to sign the JV? They cannot just simply wash their hands. 
Other than losing substantial income from their small rubber estates the JV also split the longhouses. The land dispute amongst member of the family is something normal nowadays especially the lands that involved in the JV.
Most of the NCR land owners felt betrayed by the BN representatives. There was a talk amongst the land owners that they intended to  withdraw from the JV if by the end of this year that they still do not get a reasonable dividend from Kim Loong. Some of them even informed  Bukittunggal that they will take their lands by illegal means such as sit in or through proper legal process if they still do not pay with dividend at the end of the year.
To the BN's YBs,  they must be responsible with what they had started. Their job should not be accomplished  after receiving their "kang-tow" from the developer. And if they are not willing to take responsibilities on what they had done, the land owners through their  voting rights must show these BN Representatives the way out by VOTING THEM OUT in the coming state election.

Mupok Aku


Sunday, September 26, 2010

RAZIAH GRABS MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR FOREST FOR JUST RM 250!

Kuching
Sunday, 26th September 2010


Despite numerous revelations has been made by Sarawak Report but until now no action has been taken by Malaysia Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC). What type of information does the MACC need until Taib Mahmud can  be charged? Surprisingly, for any report made against the Pakatan lawmakers, even from the ad-hoc blog  like what happened in Selangor, they will spring into action.... MACC, PLEASE WAKE UP. THE RAKYAT ARE LOOKING AT YOU!


In an act of breathtaking meanness and greed the multi-billionaire Taib family are seeking to deprive impoverished Ibans of one of Sarawak’s last remaining hardwood forests, for a paltry compensation of just RM250 per family.

Meanwhile, Sarawak Report has received exclusive new leaks which indicate that the Chief Minister himself stands to personally profit by a million times that amount (an estimated RM250,000,00) in corrupt backhanders from the deal.

Raziah Mahmud and Quality Concrete Holdings

This latest illegal raid on Native Customary Rights Land is being carried out by Quality Concrete Holdings Berhad, a company part owned and directed by the Chief Minister’s own sister, Raziah Mahmud. The Taibs, one of the richest families in Asia, have already started harvesting the timber, which is worth millions of US dollars, even though the majority of the villagers are refusing to accept the deal.

“We have been threatened that if we oppose this claim we are going against the government and opposing development” explained one protester, “but why does the government act like a common thief in this case and how much development can we achieve for RM 250?”.

The threatened area is a small range of hills near Sebangan not far from Kuching, consisting of 3,305 hectares of forest. The surrounding region has already been devastated by state-sponsored logging promoted by the Taibs in the 80s and 90s.

However until now it was not considered economic to tackle the raised ground, which has been farmed and hunted for generations by 16 villages of Iban dwellers.
The villagers explain that the area is carpeted by hundreds of thousands of tall trees, some of it valuable primary jungle containing hardwoods that are now painfully scarce. The Secretary General of the Sarawak Dayak Iban Association (SADIA) Nicholas Mujah, who comes from the community, says that there are up to 700 tons of Belian, Meranti, Bulyan, Selangan, Kapur, Kempas, Tekam, Resak, Lon, Penyau, Ruan and Engkaban available per hectare. These all command top prices in the world market, although the logging of such rare timber is now internationally condemned.

The area is also a refuge for some of Sarawak’s remaining wildlife and birdlife, much of which has been wiped out by the Taibs over the past 30 years.

Corruption and conflict of interest

The Iban owners of the forest say they are happy to conserve the wood for future generations and to conduct sustainable logging for their needs. However, the aging Chief Minister, who has already earned billions out of corrupt logging deals seems to have been unable to resist the prospect of grabbing more money by cutting it all down.

In this case, like so many others, he has used a relative, his sister Raziah Mahmud, to conduct the plunder. Raziah is a shareholder and paid Non-Executive Director of Quality Concrete Holdings, a public company largely owned by the family of Tiang Ming Sing and Tiang Ming Kok (the Chairman and Managing Director). She is therefore directly profiting from her connections with the Chief Minister, who hands out all timber licences.

The CM’s cut will be at least MR250 million - Exclusive new Revelations

However, following new leaks, Sarawak Report is now able to further reveal an even more shocking form of corruption involved in the deal. Top timber company insiders, have exclusively confided to Sarawak Report that before issuing any timber licence the Chief Minister always demands an extra secret cut, to be paid upfront into one of his offshore bank accounts.

The insiders say that Taib traditionally demands a rate of RM 100 per ton of timber. However, in this latest case the sum is likely to be substantially larger given the value of the hardwoods at the Sebangan reserve.

According to the whistle-blowers, the Chief Minister calculates his cut by getting State Forest Department officials to assess how much timber is available in each concession.

So, if the 3,305 hectare Sebangan forest contains 700 tons of wood per hectare, this would mean that, at conservative estimates, Taib will have bagged just under 250 million ringgit from issuing the licence. That is well over $80 million dollars at current exchange rates and is almost exactly a million times the amount being offered to the Iban families who rightfully own the land!

Sarawak Report would therefore like to ask Quality Concrete to confirm if they have yet made such an up front payment or if they are paying part up front and part later, which is sometimes the arrangement, or whether they are claiming that on this occasion they have been for some reason let off the payment?

Robbing his people blind

Such miserable deals have been the pattern by which the Chief Minister has deprived numerous communities in Sarawak of billions and billions of ringgit-worth of timber and made himself one of the richest men in Asia. Instead of going into promised development the money has gone into Taib’s foreign bank accounts, leaving the people of Sarawak among the poorest in Malaysia, despite their rich natural resources.

Strong-arm tactics – lies and thugs

In this latest case the Taibs are again attempting to abuse their control of state officials and adopting strong-arm tactics to force the unwilling villagers to hand over their forest, firstly through misrepresenting the terms of their licence.


The truth - Raziah's conditional licence expires in two months!

Quality Concrete have in truth, only been issued a conditional year-long Occupation Certificate to log the timber, for the very reason that this is Native Customary Rights (NCR) Land.

This certificate has been issued under Section B of the Forest Ordinance, which specifically means that Quality Concrete need to achieve the consent of the Iban landowners before commencing any logging.

However, Raziah and her business cronies have of course done no such thing, because they know that such consent would either be withheld or would only come at a reasonable price for the land! They have instead sought to imply that they are fully licenced to strip the forest.

No warning and no permission asked

”Nobody warned or consulted us about anything” explains Sadun Ason, the Headman of Kampong Ensika, one of the affected communities. “The first I knew of it was when a villager called me to say he had seen logging equipment being shipped up river by boat on 11th July. We then immediately called the Pengulu, who astonishingly said he knew all about it and told us that there is nothing we can do to protest as the whole matter is perfectly legal and we have no rights!”



Traditional meeting - community representatives discuss the crisis

The 16 villages involved are rightly suspicious of this Pengulu. Taib undermined democracy in when he removed the right of longhouses to elect their own headmen and Pengulus and started to appoint these ‘representatives’ himself.

He pays them a miserable monthly salary to keep them loyal, nevertheless, these characters usually still come from the local community and are accepted by the residents.

However, in this case a new Pengulu was appointed a few weeks before the issuing of Razia’s logging licence. He is a PBB member from an outside town. The headmen are naturally furious he kept them in the dark about Quality Concrete’s plans and the previous Pengulu has also testified against such behaviour and joined their protest.

“If there is anything that relates to the joint ownership of the forest the Pengulu should discuss the matter with the headmen and likewise the headmen would talk to their villagers. All these resources are shared resources and it is not right for the Pengulu to make a decision, especially such an important decision on his own”, says Ason emphatically. “Rightfully the Pengulu and headmen should be the ones to protect the forest, but we end up fighting him”.

Deceitful tactics by the loggers and their official backers

The villagers have tried to blockade the site and have demanded proper information and paper-work from Quality Concrete, but Raziah and her co-directors have been characteristically unforthcoming. Outrageously they have also started driving a road into the territory and harvesting valuable timber in the process.

At a meeting organised by the police on 2nd July, officials from the Forestry Department and Land Survey Department showed their bias by meeting first separately with the representatives of Quality Concrete and their lawyers along with the suspect Pengulu.

The officials then came out and claimed to the villagers that the land was not gazetted and claimed there was no evidence the area was NCR land. However, Sarawak Report has obtained evidence proving this claim was untrue. In fact the Land Registry’s own records show that the land has been gazetted since 1956 and is indeed Native Customary Rights Land. The licence Quality Concrete has bee given is subject to any NCR claims. Meanwhile, internal documents from the Forestry Department also show that officials have now instructed Quality Concrete not to encroach on the vast majority of the area contained in the provisional licence unless and until the dispute has been settled.


Gazetted since 1956 - this proof of NCR status came from the Land Registry!

Sarawak Report has copies of all these documents, however in typical fashion the officials on the ground, working with Raziah Taib and Quality Concrete and their lawyers have attempted to conceal these facts from the villagers.

Bullying into submission

Meanwhile the timber company and Pengulu have been working hard to browbeat and divide the community into submission. They have gone around all the longhouses offering MR25o ‘compensation payment’ to each family prepared to sign away their rights to the forest and MR800 to each headman. This may be a laughable sum, but Taib has kept his people financially poor for a very good reason – it makes them easier to rob of their natural wealth.

On 13th August a group of 11 villagers including three of the 16 headmen were transported in Quality Concrete’s own vehicles to Sibu, where they were given a reception and dinner and then asked to sign documents in the absence of any legal representative. They were not given copies of the documents to bring back, but they were told that they have now legally signed away their rights to the forest.


Dirt poor - this family took the money - Will the RM 250 compensation 
uplift the living standard of this family?

These headmen have now gone round other long houses and persuaded a number of the desperately poor villagers that, since they have no choice in the matter (not true), they had better take what money is available to them.

A minority of the villagers have now been persuaded to go to the nearby town of Sebuyau and sign away their claims for a mere MR250. They had no legal representative and have been offered no copies of the documents they signed – most are illiterate.

“The worst thing about it is that it has divided the villages in such a terrible way”, says Numpang Suntai who has been helping coordinate the protests. “Some are so browbeaten and poor they feel they must accept the money, but the others know that in the long-term the consequences will be terrible for us. We look at neighbouring areas where this has happened and we know we will suffer. We won’t have any wood, our land will be taken, the wildlife will be gone, the water of the river will be affected and the fish will all die. We will be hungry. Our life is tough and we have no real income, so we depend on the forest”.


Aware of the consequences - Numpang Suntai, local campaigner

Numpang dismisses the idea that there might be jobs and development. “There will be no jobs at all, they use Indonesians to cut down the forest and Indonesians to work on the palm plantations. They only offer MR7 a day to work on palm plantations and we can’t live on that. The Indonesians find it worth it, because of the exchange rate for them”.

A fit leader for Sarawak?

Taib of course believes that he will triumph in this matter. The fight for Sebangan’s final forest has reached a critical stage, which he, his sister and their timber company collaborators have experienced many times before. They have all the finance, the official backing and of course, access to intimidation as well.

The villagers are already fearfully expecting the arrival of the notorious logging company ‘thugs’, the strongmen who so often come to intimidate local communities who hold out against them. Meanwhile, the Pengulu and the logging company legal teams are misleadingly informing the protesters that because some people have now signed it will be impossible to stop the logging.


Campaigning on landrights - PKR's office in Kuching

However, signs are that people are waking up to the Chief Minister, Abdul Taib Mahmud. It will be interesting to see whether the new information revealing the true extent of Taib’s personal profit from this raid - his MR250 million cut - will alter the dynamics of this particular forest battle.

Sarawak Report will also be forwarding the inside leaks from the Land Survey Department and Forestry Department to the protestors’ newly acquired legal team, headed by Baru Bian in Kuching.

Baru, who is Sarawak’s top human rights lawyer and the PKR leader in the state, has started to win significant court victories against Taib in the local and federal courts .


Agent for Change - Baru in campaigning dress at his desk

Taib’s last grasp?

This scandalous new case will join over 200 other native land rights cases on his desk, all of which directly challenge the Taib family’s devastating plunder of the state.

Most importantly, the Chief Minister will soon face the electorate with a record that no politician on earth would wish to have to defend.

This article was copied from Sarawak Report.

Mupok Aku


AGI IDUP AGI NGELABAN

Saturday, July 24, 2010

New NCR Land Initiative Is Another Taib's Promise Of The Moon Tactic To Fish For Ibans' Votes

Kuching
Saturday, 24th July 2010


Iban/Natives of Sarawak must not get Cheated by Taib and His Barisan Nasional Regime For another 50 Years Just because of the New NCR Land Initiative. They Should Instead Vote For PKR Which Has Better NCR Land Initiative If Given the Mandate to Rule Sarawak.....Sarawak For Pakatan Rakyat!


Promise Of The Moon is Not a New Tactic Employed By BN to Fish For Vote in Sarawak. I wrote about it HERE

Taib Mahmud, the longest serving "Dictator" Minister in the word announced yesterday that the Federal and the State government is going to embark on the new NCR land initiative by the end of this year.
According to Taib, the initiative will be carried out in two steps.  The first step is the Perimeter survey,  where the Land Survey will identify the genuine NCR lands before deploying its personnel  to the ground to conduct the perimeter survey, and subsequently the NCR lands will be gazetted under Section 6 of the Sarawal Land Code (SLC). The second step involve the individual land title. The land owners and community leaders will identify the owner of the land individually before the survey is done. Eventually the owner of the NCR land will be issued with the land title pursuant to section 18 of Sarawak Land Code .
Taib added that the initiative will be carried out by the end of this year with RM 20 Million allocation from the Federal Government.
NCR land issues has been known as the opposition main weapon against Taib government. After looking at the date of the  implementation of the NCR Land  initiative, I doubt the BN sincerity in implementing the initiative. As we all awared that Taib and his cronies have been actively robbing the Iban/dayak of their NCR lands. The initiative could be another Taib's/BN's Promise of the Moon tactic  means to fish for the Iban's Vote in preparation for the State election. Considering the size of sarawak, the initiative can  take between 10-20 years to complete. We have been cheated by BN for the past 50 years therefore I am urging all the Dayaks/Ibans not to be cheated by BN for another term.

PR Offers Better Land Code Affecting Their NCR Lands If Given Mandate To Rule Sarawak

Iban has better choice in Pakatan Rakyat especially Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR). PKR in its Convention held on 28 July 2009 at Crown Tower Kuching, adopted the resolution on Land as follows :-

(1) To ensure that alienation of land shall be fair and just and that landless and needy Sarawakian families shall be entitled to apply for and be granted alienation of lands.

(2) To make it a fundamental policy that in Sarawak land belongs to the people and government only holds and administers land in trust for the people as opposed to the policy that all lands are state land.

(3) To make residential land to be issued with grants in perpetuity. All lands currently held with 60 or 90 years lease periods are to be automatically converted to land with such lease with no further payment  or premium except for nominal administrative charges.

(4) To review, amend or repeal any legislation or provisions in any land statutes that are unjust, oppressive and burdensome to landowners.

(5) To introduce amendments to the Sarawak Land Code with a view to upgrade NCR land owners from mere licenses to proprietors of land issued with documents of titles and therefore for such right to lawfully acquired through purchase, inheritance, as gifts and by other lawful means.

(6) To establish a Native Land Commissioned to identify, determine and settle all NCR lands issues with powers to investigate, review and give back NCR land ownership by issuing titles to lands which have been ascertained to have been illegally alienated and acquired.

(7) To introduce smart partnership policy to ensure all land-based development be participated by and are for the maximum  benefit of both the landowners and financiers  or the developers.

(8)  To ensure that companies alienated land for oil palm plantations truly develop the said land instead of selling them for quick profit.

(9) To recognise the cultural and customary practices of the natives relating to land use in particular "Pulau Galau" and "Pemakai Menoa" and to accord the lands involved in such practices due status.

(10) To ensure that NCR land Policy conforms to the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indegenous people. This means to respect the inherent rights of the indegenous peoples especially their rights to their lands, territories and resources and their rights not to be subjected to any action which dispossess them of  the same and from any form of forced population transfer which violates or undermines any of their rights (Article 8 and Article 26).

(11) To introduce a Land Acquisition Ordinance to provide that land shall be acquired for a truly public purposes and be properly and fairly compensated by the government and that no person should be deprived of his land without fair compensation. That land acquisition process ought to be carried out in a fair, just and transparent manner and that Section 47 Land Code Procedure ought to be reviewed or even abolished.

(12) To recognise all forests on NCR lands as Native Forests.

(13) To restore NCR lands in Batang Ai and Bakun (HEP) and future HEPs that are not inundated and that they to be given back to the former NCR owners.

(14) To ensure that all developments affecting NCR lands shall be based on free, prior and informed consented.

Conclusion

BN has been ruling Sarawak for nearly 50 years and throughout that 50 years period they had robbed Iban/natives of their NCR lands in the name of politic of Development.
Whereas PR through Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) had 14 points resolution regarding Land which will protect the NCR lands.
As a conclusion, Iban/Dayak should not risk their NCR lands by Voting for BN. They SHOULD CHOOSE PAKATAN RAKYAT, AS THE LATER HAD PROMISED BETTER CODE FOR NCR LANDS IF GIVEN THE MANDATE TO RULE SARAWAK.

Mupok Aku

AGI IDUP AGI NGELABAN
Blog Widget by LinkWithin

BlogTopsites

Politics Blogs - Blog Top Sites

Alexia Rank

Technorati

BlogSearch Engine

BlogRanking

Politics Blogs - Blog Rankings