UMNO Memperbodohkan Komponen BN Yang Lain Melalui NGO Melayu dan Islam

Kuching
Tuesday, 13th September 2011

Tanpa kekuatan Parti-Parti lain di dalam BN seperti MCA mewakili Kaum Cina, MIC untuk Kaum India, PBS mewakili kaum Kadazan serta PRS dan SPDP mewakili kaum Iban, UMNO tidak akan dapat memerintah Malaysia secara mutlak. Oleh yang demikian walaupun mewakili kaum Melayu-Islam, UMNO tidak akan memperjuangkan hak Kaum Melayu-Muslim sehingga menyinggung perasaan kaum-kaum lain di dalam komponen BN. Oleh yang demikian, pertumbuhan bagaikan cendawan NGO-NGO yang memperjuangkan hak-hak orang Melayu-Islam seperti PERKASA, Jaringan Melayu Malaysia (JMM), Ikatan Muslimin Malaysia (ISMA) dan lain-lain adalah merupakan pertubuhan yang ditaja oleh UMNO untuk memperjuangkan hak-hak kaum Melayu-Islam di Malaysia.

Malaysians Reminded not to Get Fool By These two Stooges

Melihat perkembangan politik semasa sekarang di mana UMNO menggunakan politik perkauman dan agama, saya merasa hairan dengan ketidak-upayaan pemimpin-pemimpin kaum India, Cina, Dayak serta peribumi Sabah untuk  membaca gerakan-gerakan UMNO yang macam mengutamakan Kaum Melayu-Islam (walaupun sebenarnya adalah  untuk kepentingan kroni-kroni elit UMNO) sahaja.

Alangkah bodohnya pemimpin-pemimpin kaum ini yang  tidak dapat menyelami taktik kotor UMNO ini. Lebih parah lagi apabila saya perhatikan akan ketidak-upayaan pemimpin dari Sabah-Sarawak yang majoriti penduduknya adalah dari kaum peribumi yang beagama Kristian untuk membela (Bukan membela secara kekerasan tapi dengan kekuatan undi)  nasib penganut agama Kristian di Semenanjung yang acapkali dibuli olen NGO Melayu-Islam. Cuba imbas kembali tentang apa yang berlaku di Semenanjung contohnya perbuatan Damansara Utama Methodist Church (DUMC) yang memberikan bantuan kepada penganut Islam yang daif, tetapi telah dilayan bagaikan penjenayah oleh MAIS dan bibantu oleh PDRM UMNO. Saya ingin mengajukan pertanyaan kepada pemimpin-pemimpin bukan Muslim daripada BN seperti Masing, Jabu, Manyin, Dr Wong Soon Koh, Pairin Kitingan dll, kenapa berdiam diri? Di manakah telur-telur kalian? Kecut sehingga masuk ke dalam perutke?

Kepada pemimpin-pemimpin di dalam BN yang mewakili kaum India, Cina, Dayak serta peribumi Sabah takkanlah kalian tidak tahu bahawa UMNO berselindung di belakang NGO-NGO Melayu-Islam? Cuba tengok betul-betul NGO yang ektremis ini. Majoriti daripada keanggotaan serta pemimpin-pemimpin NGO  ini adalah terdiri daripada ahli-ahli UMNO. Tak ada otak atau matakah kalian? Atau otak letak atas kepala lutut.

Saya ingin mencabar pemimpin-pemimpin di dalam BN yang mewakili pengundi-pengundi daripada kaum bukan Muslim agar bersuara atau meletak jawatan yang telah diamanatkan oleh pengundi-pengundi kepada kamu sekelian. Cukuplah makan gaji buta atau mengisi kocek sendiri!

Saya menulis pada kali ini bukan atas dorongan kerana membenci kaum Melayu-Islam, jauh sekali,  ini kerana kebanyakan kawan saya adalah kaum Melayu-Islam. Tujuan saya menulis kali ini adalah sekadar untuk menyedarkan pemimpin-pemimpin yang mewakili kaum bukan-Islam di Malaysia ini agar tidak terpedaya oleh taktik kotor UMNO.

Sebagai mengakhiri tulisan saya pada kali ini, sekali lagi saya ingin mengingatkan pemimpin-pemimpin dari parti-parti seperti MCA mewakili Kaum Cina, MIC untuk Kaum India, PBS mewakili kaum Kadazan serta PRS dan SPDP mewakili kaum Iban, agar tidak terpedaya oleh UMNO yang berselindung di sebalik NGO Melayu-Islam. Saya juga berharap agar pemimpin-pemimpin ini tidak terpedaya oleh retorik 1Malaysia PM Najib kerana keadaan di Malaysia sekarang dari segi kehormonian serta kebebasan beragama serta semangat perkauman adalah lebih slogan daripada kenyataan. Masih ingatkah kita akan jawapan TPM Mahyuddin yang diajukan dengan soalan tentang 1Malaysia? Saya harap pembaca semua boleh ingat bahawai bagi Mahyuddin adalah "Malay First, Malaysia Second" . Itukah makna 1Malaysia yang diwar-warkan oleh PM Najib? Saya tidak perlu jelaskan di sini. Saya mengharapkan agar pembaca-pembaca Bukittunggal menjawab sendiri persoalan ini serta menterjemahkannya di dalam bentuk undi kelian.

Mupok Aku

German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) is investigating Deutsche Bank For Suspected Money Laundering With Taib Mahmud

Kuching
Monday, 12th September 2011

The German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) is investigating Deutsche Bank’s business relations with the family of Malaysian potentate Abdul Taib Mahmud (“Taib”)

In its capacity as the supervisory authority for “financial institutions in respect of money laundering legislation”, Germany’s Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) has launched investigations into the Deutsche Bank on account of its business relations with the Malaysian Taib family. This has been confirmed by the German Federal Ministry of Finance in response to an enquiry by the Bruno Manser Fonds.

In an e-mail to the Bruno Manser Fund, the Federal Ministry of Finance, under Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble, states that it has “requested the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority to clarify and check the situation that you outline in your letter to the Federal Chancellor from the money-laundering angle, insofar as this concerns a specific financial institution and, if the Financial Supervisory Authority considers it appropriate, to instigate supervisory measures.” The Financial Supervisory Authority “has already made a start on clarifying the situation.”

The Bruno Manser Fund welcomes the investigation and is calling on the German federal government to freeze any Taib assets in Germany. In addition, the Fund is demanding complete transparency from Deutsche Bank with regard to its dealings with the Taib family and the termination of its business relations with the Malaysian potentate, who has gained a bad reputation worldwide.

In a letter to Federal Chancellor Angela Merkel, the Bruno Manser Fonds, the Hamburg “Rettet den Regenwald”(Rainforest-Rescue) Association and the Society for Threatened Peoples drew the attention of the German government to the Deutsche Bank’s close business relations with Malaysian potentate Abdul Taib Mahmud (“Taib”) and demanded that any Taib assets in Germany be blocked.

Joint ventures between Deutsche Bank and the Taib family

Since 2004, Deutsche Bank has processed transactions worth several hundred million euros for the Sarawak government and is engaged in a joint venture in Malaysia with the Cahya Mata Sarawak company (CMS), which is controlled by the Taib family.

CMS and Deutsche Bank are the principal shareholders of the finance company K & N Kenanga Holdings, domiciled in Kuala Lumpur, with its subsidiary Kenanga Deutsche Futures, an accredited broker at the Malaysian stock exchange. The CMS construction conglomerate essentially lives off assignments that are awarded by the Taib government without public tenders. CMS thus benefited greatly from the construction of the disputed Bakun dam and has a ten-year contract for maintaining the entire road network in Sarawak, Malaysia’s biggest federal state.

Potentate’s assets likely to run into billions

With the German government’s announcement, the Malaysian potentate, who has been in power since 1981, is now at the centre of an investigation for the third time within just a few months. In May 2011, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority, FINMA, announced an investigation into any Taib assets in Switzerland, at the instigation of Swiss President Micheline Calmy-Rey. At the start of June, the Malaysian anti-corruption commission MACC announced that proceedings had been launched against Taib on account of corruption. Observers reckon that, during the three decades of his rule, Taib has amassed a fortune of several billion US dollars through his abuse of office and corruption.

Since 1981, Abdul Taib Mahmud has concurrently held the three posts of head of government, minister of finance and minister of natural resources for Sarawak, Malaysia’s biggest federal state. Taib is regarded as holding prime responsibility for the extensive destruction of the tropical rainforest of Sarawak on Borneo. Just recently, former British prime minister, Gordon Brown, described the destruction of the Sarawak rainforest as “probably the biggest environmental crime of our times”.

Due to Taib? – Deutsche Bank closed a Bruno Manser Fund donation account

Since it was established in 1991, the Bruno Manser Fund, which was set up by Swiss rainforest advocate, Bruno Manser, who later went missing, has been committed to fighting the clearing of the rainforests of Sarawak and the corruption of the Taib government. A paraglider flight by Manser in 1999 onto the Kuching residence of Sawarak’s head of government, Abdul Taib Mahmud, caused a great stir.

At the end of 2004, Deutsche Bank refused to continue running a donation account for the Bruno Manser Fund that it had held at the bank’s Lörrach, Germany, branch for many years. The bank terminated its business relations with the Swiss association citing its General Terms and Conditions. Despite the Bruno Manser Fund contacting Deutsche Bank CEO, Joe Ackermann, a Swiss national, the bank stuck to its decision: “There is a reason for this decision. But no one will tell you what it is”, is what a spokesman of Deutsche Bank said to the Bruno Manser Fund at the time. The Bruno Manser Fund assumes that the account was closed out of consideration to the close business relationship between Deutsche Bank and the Taib family.

Please see Statement by the German Finance Ministry to the Bruno Manser Fund on 5 September 2011

Statement by the German Finance Ministry to the Bruno Manser Fund


(English Translation: Bruno Manser Fund)


First of all, I would like to extend my sincere thanks to you and the Bruno Manser Fund for your


commitment to fighting corruption, which also emerges from your letter to the Federal Chancellor


dated 20 June 2011. In this letter, you report on accusations of corruption against Abdul Taib Mahmud


and his family and ask that potential business links to Deutsche Bank be examined. In the light of your


enquiry of 29 August 2011, I am pleased to report to you on the steps launched by the German


Federal Ministry of Finance (BMF) within its scope of competence.


The German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin), which comes under the Federal Ministry


of Finance, is not only responsible for bank supervision but also for the supervision of financial


institutions in respect of money laundering legislation. To enable it to fulfil its duties, the Federal


Financial Supervisory Authority has event-driven and event-independent rights of information and


inspection vis-à-vis the financial institutions, under the terms of §44 of the German Banking Act


(Kreditwesengesetz), which cover all business activities; this can also include business relations with


individual customers. Under the terms of the Money Laundering Act (Geldwäschegesetz) and the


Banking Act, banks are obliged to engage in customer due diligence. In addition to identifying and


verifying the contractual partner and any beneficial owners, the bank is required to clarify the


background to the business relationship and continuously monitor the business relationship. This


measure is designed to make it possible to track flows of money and to recognise unusual or even


suspicious transactions. In the case of so-called politically exposed persons, an increased risk of


money laundering has to be assumed, and hence a greater level of due diligence must be observed.


Corruption offences rank amongst the predicate offences for money laundering.


Against this background, I have requested the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority to


clarify and verify the situation that you outline in your letter to the Federal Chancellor in moneylaundering


terms, insofar as this concerns a specific financial institution and, if the Financial


Supervisory Authority considers it appropriate, to instigate supervisory measures. The Financial


Supervisory Authority has already made a start on clarifying the situation. It must, however, be borne


in mind that the employees of the Financial Supervisory Authority have a duty to maintain


confidentially under the terms of § 9 of the German Banking Act. It is thus not possible to provide you,


or the Bruno Manser Fund, with details of this examination and the results.


I trust that the measures taken constitute a satisfactory response to your concerns.


With kind regards,


Sarah Merzbach


Sarah J. Merzbach, LL.M. (Univ. of Chicago)

Kelab Putera 1Malaysia Mission to Somalia Was It For Humanitarian Or Political Reason

Kuching
Saturday, 10th September 2011

If not because of the death of a BERNAMA TV cameraman Noramfaizul Mohd Nor, I would not paid much attention to the activities of this organization because I knew who these people and the motives of their activities were.

The Motives of the Club Mission to Somalia : For Humanitarian or Political Reason?

The death of a BERNAMA TV cameraman Noramfaizul Mohd Nor had been given wider coverage from UMNO newspaper and TV stations compared to the the coverage they gave to the death of five soldiers serving the United Nations Operations in Somalia (Unosom) between 1993 and 1994. These five soldiers were Cpl Mat Aznan Awang who was mortally wounded in a military operation to rescue United States Army Rangers, made famous by the movie Black Hawk Down, in October 1993, next Staff Sgt Azman Mohamed Tahir, of the 21st Special Forces Group and Cpl Gani Binyol of the 6th Royal Ranger Regiment who were killed in an ambush during a UN escort mission in Mogadishu, the fourth and fifth soldier that perished in Somalia were Sgt Abdul Kadir Bakri and Cpl Azhear Shuib, of 22nd Commando, died in separate accidents while patrolling the devastated city.

I am not against any efforts by the government or NGO to assist late Noramfaizaul's family, but the assistance should not be more or the same with those given to the soldiers' families. Those five soldiers were died while on tour of duty serving the Yang DiPertuan Agong whereas BERNAMA cameraman was killed while serving the Kelab Putera 1Malaysia anchored by UMNO for political reason. If we look back at the composition of the member of the Kelab Putera 1Malaysia that went for the mission to Somalia, we would realized that most of them were from the members of press own by UMNO. The group were led by Datuk Abdul Azeez Abdul Rahim who was an UMNO man. The mission was more toward  publicity than humanitarian. Did anyone realise that the mission was  received more media coverage compared to the one given to the Malaysian soldiers that went for UN Peacekeeping mission. Let me ask all Malaysians out there inclusive the members of Kelab Putera 1Malaysia? How many Malaysian soldiers are there on UN Peacekeeping mission abroad  leaving their wives or  children behind?

This picture shown one of the house own by poor Sarawakian (Not in Somalia). To Kelab Putera 1Malaysia (UMNO) wasn't it was to help poor Malaysians compare to the poor from other country?

If the Kelab Putera 1Malaysia really sincere to helping the needy, they can help those in Malaysia such as the widows and family members of the ex-armed forces or the police. On top of that there are many Malaysians especially those in rural Sarawak and Sabah that live under the poverty line. Why we need to waste our monies (the tax payers monies actually) abroad if there are still lot of Malaysians that needed assistance?

To conclude, I would like to remind Kelab Putera 1Malaysia, not to waste tax payers monies abroad and if you have extra monies please spend them on poor Malaysians who still live under the poverty line.

Mupok Aku

NCR Land Grab In Sarawak : Chief Justice Zaki Azmi and Richard Malanjum Had let the public down Said Law Prof Abdul Aziz

Kuching
Friday, 9th Sep 2011

Yesterday, 8 Sep 2011, the Federal Court dismissed an appeal to try a case seeking to regain native customary rights (NCR) for indigenous lands in Sarawak. The appeal by group of Sarawakian indigenous people over the lands they are living in was dismissed by a Federal Court’s three-man panel led by Chief Justice Tun Zaki Azmi who was accompanied by by Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak Tan Sri Richard Malanjum and Federal Court judge Datuk Seri Md Raus Sharif. The judges dismissed the appeal saying it was not “proper to do so”. “In my opinion, there seems to possibly be other grounds for challenging the unconstitutionality of section 5(3) and (4) of the Code but unfortunately... these were not raised or properly canvassed before us,” Zaki told the court. On the question of whether Sarawak’s state laws on tribal land issues was unconstitutional, Malanjum and Zaki declined to answer citing insufficient material while Shariff said the extinguishment was constitutional. The decision of these three judges especially the one made by Chief Justice Tun Zaki Azmi and Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak Tan Sri Richard Malanjum had drwan criticism and negative comments by the public and the Malaysians especially which touched on “whether section 5(3) and (4) of the Sarawak Land Code relating to the extinguishment of native customary rights are ultra vires Article 5 (Right to life) and Article 13 (right to property) of the Federal Constitution.”

One of the critic of their decision was from a Law Prof Abdul Aziz.

Sarawak is the Only State in Malaysia beside Sarawak that does not respect Article 13 of Federal Constitution "the Right to Property". Land Grab is something normal in Sarawak. 

A law professor said Chief Justice Zaki Azmi and Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak Justice Richard Malanjum, could have abdicated their oath of office by their refusal to interpret the question of law posed to them.

The question posed before the court was “whether section 5(3) and (4) of the Sarawak Land Code relating to the extinguishment of native customary rights are ultra vires Article 5 (Right to life) and Article 13 (right to property) of the Federal Constitution.”

Islamic International University professor Abdul Aziz Bari said by refusing to deal with the constitutionality issue, the Federal court has abdicated its duty.

“Under the Federal Constitution, the Federal Court which is the highest court of the land is essentially the constitutional court of the country; the main tribunal whose major duty is to take care of the constitution,” he said.

Professor Abdul Aziz: Constitutional question: Judges let public down

Abdul Aziz pointed out that their refusal meant that they had failed to fulfill their oath when taking office by saying “I will faithfully discharge my judicial duties in that office to the best ability, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to Malaysia, and will preserve, protect and defend its constitution.”

The don added that the court is the custodian of justice, so the judges have let the citizens down for the constitution is the supreme law of the land, one that protects them from arbitrariness whether in the form of laws passed by the legislature or through executive decisions.

“It is the duty of the judiciary to declare the rights of the citizens, being custodial of justice,” he said.

Yesterday Zaki and Malanjum refused to interpret the constitutional question affecting the Bato Bagi land case involving native customary right land in Sarawak which was seized to build the Bakun dam.

Zaki had cited the issue was not properly canvassed before the court to decide, while Malanjum said the lawyers had not fully assisted the court when the question posed was staring at the parties.

Cold feet at the bench?

Abdul Aziz said it is only the constitution which is left to protect the rights of poor indigenous Sarawakians.

“The decision, despite ruling that the deal was legal, did not base it on the constitution; something that the court was asked specifically by that aggrieved group of citizens. The court must decide, one way or the other, how it sees the issue. It cannot leave the matter open like it did today(yesterday),” he emphasised.

Baru Bian and the Land Owners

He noted the project itself is essentially “an environmental disaster”.

Abdul Aziz said the court has a history of being afflicted with cold feet when confronted with critical cases like these, this case not being the first.

“When the then Supreme Court was asked to decide on the constitutionality of Malaysia’s formation way back in 1963, the court at that time headed by Chief Justice Thomson (an expatriate), ruled in Tunku Abdul Rahman’s favour. A United States paper has also described the court as the least powerful of the three branches of executive, legislature and judiciary.”

“So the people have to decide what to do next; the battle in court is obviously over.”

‘Case cannot be good authority’

Abdul Aziz said from the law standpoint when the decision is not decided unanimously, then there is a loophole.

“Since there is only one judge who made a ruling (on the constitutional question) on it, this case cannot be a strong authority.

“In any case, one wonders why the two did not make up their mind? Is it a case of just wanting to let go this one and later the court can take a more restrictive approach?” he asked, adding that the bottom line is the same; that the land grab is now deemed legal and the citizens have lost.

Under Taib: NCR Land is a State Land but where are the rest of the dayak politicians or so called those who fight for the dayak. People like Masing, Jabu, Mawan and Manyin has lost their balls!

The law expert said the right to property is guaranteed by the constitution under Article 13 of the supreme law of the nation.

“There seems to be a kind of politics or manoeuvring here,” observed Abdul Aziz.

Association of Malay Military Veterans’ Selangor and Wilayah Persekutuan Is Warned To Be Remained Neutral

Kuching
Thursday, 8th Sep 2011

I warn all the members of the ex-servicemen association not to be used by politicians for political reason. We should remain neutral. Any member wants to get Involve  in politic please join political party and fight from there! 

Being the ex-serviceman myself, I warn the member of Association of Malay Military Veterans’ Selangor and Wilayah Persekutuan to stay neutral and not to siding any political party. Based on the action of this association, they are not fit to use the word veteran. They should join UMNO and fight with UMNO.

Why there must be a veteran association based on race or religion? Is there any motive behind it. Since the Utusan Malaysia report on apostasy in Selangor, the Association of Malay Military Veterans’ Selangor and Wilayah Persekutuan has been seen very vocal in condemning the Damansara Utama Methodist Church (DUMC). Whether they aware that their actions could jeorpardise the comradeship spirit among the Muslim and Non-Muslim soldiers that were still serving the Armed-Forces this group just don't care about it.

Mohd Ali Baharom the association chief (frankly speaking I never heard such a  coward name while still serving in the Armed Forces)  should be stripped off whatever title that he had from the service for using the Veteran name for his political gain.

I am not supporting the communist, but I am condemning  anyone who condemns Mat Sabu without knowing head and tail or merely from the information that they obtained from UMNO racist newspaper Utusan Malaysia. As far as I knew, YB Mat Sabu had never mentioned that he supported the Communist Party of Malaya (CPM). It was Utusan Malaysia that exaggerated the matter. 

Same warning also directed to Persatuan Bekas Polis Sarawak (PBPS). The association and its President Wan Junaidi who is also the Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu (PBB ) assemblyman had so far seen very vocal in condemning YB Mat Sabu. The members of the association have been used by Wan Junaidi to condemn YB Mat Sabu for political reason. If I have any chance to meet any of the association members, I will ask them the reason why they condemn YB Mat Sabu. I am not surprised they have no answer to offer except for just follow their President instruction!

Lastly I would like to remind all the ex-servicemen to refrain from making any statement which can drag the association into  political crisis or being used by the politicians.

Mupok Aku

Hari Raya Wishes Confirmed That PM Najib Was Indeed Under Queen Control

Kuching
Thursday, 8th Sep 2011

Who is on the helm of power? Is it PM Najib or his wife Rosmah?

Throughout my entire life, this year Hari raya was the first time that I ever seen the Prime Minister's wife being given the special slot to give the Hari raya speech to Malaysians broadcast on television. This to me indicated that PM Najib is under the Queen Control of his wife Rosmah Mansor. Even Tun Mahathir's wife Dr Siti Hasmah who is far more intelligent and qualified than Rosamah during his husband more than 20 years tenure as PM of Malaysia had never been given any opportunity to deliver any Hari Raya speech broadcast on TV.

In related to the above, Johor PKR chief Chua Jui Meng said today that Najib was not fit to be a national leader because he apparently was not even in control in his own home.

“He cannot even control his wife,” he said, laughing.

Najib was the first Malaysian prime minister to have shared the spotlight with his wife when delivering the customary Hari Raya message.

The programme was divided into three segments—one showing Najib giving his message, another showing Rosmah giving hers and the last part showing the two of them giving a joint message.

The broadcast has been repeated several times since Aug 31.

Chua said it looked more like a comedy show than an official message from a prime minister who was serious about his work

The First Lady Of Malaysia (FLOM)

Chua, a former vice president of MCA, said he was sure that former prime ministers Dr Mahathir Mohamad and Abdullah Ahmad Badawi shared his disdain over Rosmah’s attempt to assert her importance.

“The two former premiers must be laughing away, but I don’t think they are happy with such unseemly behaviour.

“I don’t think this has happened anywhere else. China? Singapore? Indonesia? Only in 1Malaysia.”

Bukit Bendera MP Liew Chin Tong agreed that Rosmah had no official standing to deliver the speech.

“The prime minister’s wife is not the First Lady,” he said. “She is a private person.”

The information received by Bukittunggal, majority of Malaysians shared the same sentiment with Dr Chua. They felt that  Rosmah was just a PM wife and not supposed to make any Hari Raya speech. During the broadcasting she might sat beside her husband not more than that. 

Let's see how far PM Najib can get long with power crazy woman as a wife like Rosmah.


Mupok Aku

Video Seks Puteri UMNO

Kuching
Wednesday, 7th September 2011

Puteri UMNO terlibat dengan Video Seks?

Sekilas pandang saya ingat laporan Utusan Malaysia berkenaan video seks di atas adalah melibatkan puteri UMNO. Tetapi apabila difikirkan lebih lanjut tidak mungkin Utusan Malaysia sanggup untuk  menyiarkan berita yang akan membuka pekung pemiliknya. Almaklumlah akhbar yang lebih layak untuk dijadikan pembungkus nasi lemak ini tidak mempunyai "telur" untuk melaporkan benda sensasi yang bakal mengaibkan tuannya walaupun mengetahui bahawa berita tersebut adalah 100 peratus kebenarannya.

Tidak keterlaluan kalau saya katakan bahawa akhbar nilai sekupang ini hanya berani melaporkan berita-berita sensasi yang bakal memalukan pencabar tuannya walaupun mengetahui bahawa berita berkenaan adalah tidak sahih semata-mata.

Cuba imbas kembali tentang isi berita yang kerap disiarkan oleh akhbar ini semenjak Mat Sabu menyebut di dalam ceramahnya berkenaan dengan peristiwa Bukit Kepong walaupun beliau tidak pernah menyebut dan memuja Parti Komunis Malaya (PKM), saban hari berita yang disiarkan adalah berkenaan dengan kutukan terhadap YB Mat Sabu. Bukan sahaja kutukan daripada Doktor Gigi yang tidak tahu sejarah dan hanya pandai menggelapkan wang rakyat Negeri Selangor diberi peluang untuk menghentam Mat sabu, malahan kutukan daripada anak bekas polis yang terlibat di dalam peristiwa Bukit Kepong yang tidak mengerti erti memperjuangkan kemerdekaan juga turut disiarkan.

Saya percaya bahawa kutukan ini tidak akan berhenti sehinggalah terciptanya satu lagi kontroversi yang boleh mengaibkan Gagasan Pakatan Rakyat.

Berbalik kepada laporan Utusan Malaysia tentang Puteri UMNO dan Video seks, rupa-rupanya berita sensasi tersebut adalah berhubungan dengan laporan polis yang dibuat oleh anggota puteri UMNO yang bernama Shahanim Mohd. Yusof iaitu Naib Pergerakan Puteri UMNO terhadap Ketua Perikat Pembangkang tersohor Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim berhubung dengan laporan polis yang beliau buat pada bulan Mac yang lepas menafikan bahawa beliau adalah pelaku di dalam vide seks yang didedahkan trio Datuk T. Sekali pandang memang mengaibkanlah kalau seorang yang bertudung macam Shahanim terlibat dengan video seks.

Tapi apakah motif Shahanim membuat laporan polis tersebut? Pada saya ada dua sebab mengapa beliau membuat laporan polis. yang pertama untuk mengambil hati pimpinan UMNO terutamnya PM Najib justeru dapatlah beliau dilantik sebagai Senator. Umum mengetahui bahawa sebagai ahli UMNO amat senanglah bagi seseorang itu untuk dilantik sebagai senator yang pentingnya...Aibkan Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. Cuba lihat Sengkatak (Senator katak) Mohd Ezam. Dengan mengutuk DSAI beliau telah dilantik sebagai Senator...Senator Katak Tong Kosong...

Sebab yang kedua, mungkin buntut beliau telah dicucuk oleh pemimpin senior UMNO. Seperti yang semua sedia maklum di kebelakangan ini puteri UMNO tidak berapa menyengat serta tidak mempunyai isu yang dibangkitkan tidak seperti zaman Azalina iaitu bekas menteri yang digugurkan oleh PM Najib yang begitu lantang bersuara....

Sebagai orang luar UMNO serta PKR dan PAS saya hanya mampu melihat sahaja, lantaklah demo....saya hanya berminat nak menonton video seks puteri UMNO sekiranya betul-betul wujud.

Mupok Aku

Jabatan Imigresen Melakukan Pemerdagangan Manusia: Wikileaks

Kuching
Sunday, 4th September 2011

Saya tidak terkejut dengan maklumat Wikileaks berhubung dengan pengelibatan kakitangan Jabatan Imigresen di dalam kegiatan pemerdagangan manusia ini disebabkan pekerjaan mereka ada peluang (Opportunity) untuk berbuat demikian. Kalau pihak pengurusan Jabatan Imigresen benar-benar ingin membenteras salah-laku di kalangan anggota dan pegawainya, perkara ini boleh dimulakan di kalangan anggota pejabat. Bukittunggal ingin menarik perhatian Jabatan Imigresen agar memantau anggota kaunter mereka yang cenderung meminta "perk" daripada mereka yang membuat urusan dengan mereka, contohnya mereka-mereka  yang menguruskan permit pekerjaan.

Maklumat daripada Wikileaks melaporkan bahawa anggota Imigresen yang bertugas di sempadan cenderung melakukan kesalahan pemerdagangan manusia. Tetapi yang menghairankan kenapa sehingga sekarang tidak adapun yang didakwa di mahkamah atas kesalahan yang dilakukan. Adakah Jabatan Imigresen cuba melindungi kelemahan jabatan tersebut?

Kabel diplomatik sulit Amerika Syarikat bermula tahun 2008 menimbulkan dakwaan yang serius berhubung aktiviti penyeludupan manusia oleh kakitangan Jabatan Imigresen Malaysia yang bekerja di sempadan Malaysia-Thai.

Kabel, bertarikh 10 Sept, 2008 itu, menggariskan laporan oleh Keith Luse, seorang kakitangan profesional Jawatankuasa Perhubungan Luar Senat, berhubung siasatannya mengenai dakwaan pelarian Burma diseludup masuk di sempadan dengan bantuan pegawai imigresen Malaysia.

Menurut kabel itu, Luse, yang berada di negara ini pada 25 hingga 31 Ogos, telah bertemu dengan pelbagai NGO, aktivis, pelarian dan perwakilan Pesuruhjaya Tinggi Pertubuhan Bangsa-Bangsa Bersatu bagi Pelarian (UNHCR).

Mereka secara umum mengakui kakitangan imigresen peringkat bawahan terbabit dalam penyeludupan pelarian Burma.

Aktivis dan badan-badan bukan kerajaan itu juga memberitahu Luse bahawa penyeludup manusia yang berurusan dengan pihak berkuasa imigresen Malaysia, terdiri daripada rakyat Thailand, Malaysia dan Burma, kata kabel itu.

Berdasarkan sumber, aktiviti pemerdagangan manusia di sempadan Thai-Malaysia seperti yang digariskan oleh Luse, berlaku sekitar jam 1 pagi hingga 3 pagi. Pegawai imigresen dilaporkan mengangkut pelarian Burma dari Pusat Tahanan Imigresen (IDC) menggunakan kenderaan rasmi.

Pelarian berkenaan kemudiannya didakwa diserahkan kepada penyeludup yang beroperasi dari kawasan Thailand di sempadan berkenaan.

"Pegawai Imigresen menerima antara RM400 hingga RM700 bagi setiap pelarian. Saiz kumpulan pelarian yang dijual kepada pedagang manusia itu pula, puratanya antara 45 hingga 100 orang, termasuk lelaki, wanita dan kanak-kanak," kata kabel yang dimuat-naikan di portal Wikileaks.

Menurut laporan Luse, penyeludup berkenaan akan memberi pelarian itu peluang untuk menghubungi seseorang di Malaysia bagi membayar wang tebusan sebanyak RM1,500 hingga RM1 900 bagi setiap orang.

"Mereka yang mampu menjelaskan wang tebusan kemudiannya diseludup masuk semula ke Malaysia dan dibebaskan.

"Mereka yang tidak mampu membayar dijual kepada industri perikanan Thai, kilang-kilang atau ladang-ladang jika pelarian itu seorang lelaki.

“Pedagang manusia ini didakwa menjual wanita ke rumah pelacuran, hotel dan tempat perhambaan. Sesetengah sumber menyatakan bahawa para pedagang manusia memaksa sesetengah kanak-kanak bekerja sebagai pengemis kanak-kanak di Bangkok dan di tempat-tempat lain," kata kabel, yang bagaimanapun menegaskan bahawa dakwaan terakhir itu dibuat tanpa bukti.

Diharapkan Jabatan Imigresen mengambil tindakan sewajarnya!

Mupok Aku

JAKIM Guidelines For Muslims Celebrating Religious Festivals Of Non-Muslims Contradicts Najib's 1Malaysia

Kuching
Friday, 2nd September 2011

To all the non-muslim Malaysians who have muslim friends or family members who had converted to Islam with this new guidelines from Jabatan Kemajuan Islam Malaysia (JAKIM) you may want to consider inviting them to your house or functions such as house warming, Christmas open house, wedding party..etc. to avoid your function being raided by the Islamic Authority.

Before I read these guidelines from JAKIM, I was strongly believed that Malaysia was a moderate Islamic country. This was further supported by the experiences that I had while serving in the military about 12 years back where the muslims and non-muslims colleagues were free to visit each others during the festivals such as Hari Raya Puasa, Hari Raya Haji, Christmas, Gawai Dayak, Deepavali, Chinese New Year, Gawai Dayak and so forth. During the funeral  or wedding of the Christian soldiers which would be normally held in the church, the muslims Officer Command (OC), the Commanding Officer (CO) or the officer would attend the ceremony without worry their islamic faith being jeorpardised.
But with these guidelines, Malaysia is worse that Taliban. There is no way that the muslims can attend the the other religious festivals other than the festivals celebrated by muslim such as Deepavali, Christmas, Wesak day etc as these festivals contradict with JAKIM's regulations. The family members converted to Islam also cannot visit their family members as this will also against the JAKIM's regulations.
For the Benefits of  all the readers of Bukittunggal, below please find the said guidelines from JAKIM.


If PM Najib really sincere with the 1Malaysia concept, he must first look into the policies of the government agencies so as not becoming the stumble block for 1Malaysia!

Mupok Aku

Guidelines For Muslims Celebrating Religious Festivals Of Non-Muslims



The 68th muzakarah of the National Fatwa Committee for Islamic Religious Affairs on April 12, 2005 discussed the Guidelines For Muslims Celebrating Religious Festivals Of Non-Muslims. The muzakarah has decided that:
In determining the non-Muslim celebrations that can be attended by Muslims, several main criteria should serve as guidelines so as not to contradict the teachings of Islam. The criteria are as follows:

1)  The event is not accompanied by ceremonies that are against the Islamic faith (aqidah).

The meaning of “against the Islamic faith (aqidah)” is a thing, act, word or situation which if conducted will lead to tarnishing the faith (aqidah) of Muslims.

For example:
a) To include religious symbols such as the cross, installing lights, candles, Christmas tree and so forth;
b) To sing religious songs;
c) To put any religious markings on the forehead, or other markings onto parts of the body;
d) To deliver speech or gestures in the form of a praise to the non-Muslim religion;
e) To bow or conduct acts of honour to the religious ceremony of non-Muslims.

2) The event is not accompanied by acts against the Islamic law.
The meaning of “against the Islamic law” is a thing, act, word or situation which if conducted will contradict the Islamic teachings practised by the Muslim community.

For example:
a) Wearing red costumes like Santa Claus or other garments that reflect religion;
b) Serving intoxicating food or beverages and the likes;
c) Having sounds or ornaments like church bells, Christmas tree, temple or breaking of coconuts;
d) Having ceremonies with elements of gaming, worship, cult, superstitions and the likes.

3) The event is not accompanied by “acts that contradict with moral and cultural development of Muslim society” in this country.

The meaning of “acts that contradict with moral and cultural development of Muslim society” is a thing, act, word or situation which if conducted will contradict the values and norms of the Muslim society of this country which adheres to the Islamic teachings based on Ahlus Sunnah Wal-Jamaah.

For example:

a) Mixing freely without any limit or manners;
b) Wearing conspicuous clothing;
c) Singing songs that contain lyrics of obscenity and worship;
d) Organising programmes such as beauty pageants, cock fighting and such.

4) The event is not accompanied by acts that can “stir the sensitivity of Muslim community”.

The meaning of “stir the sensitivity of Muslim community” is a thing, act, word or situation which if conducted will offend the feelings of Muslims about their beliefs and practices.

For Example:

a) Speeches or songs in the form of non-Muslim religious propaganda;
b) Speeches that insult the Muslims;
c) Speeches that insult Islam;
d) Presentations with the aim to ridicule the religious belief of Muslims.

The organisers and the public are asked to get the views of religious authorities before organising or attending celebrations of non-Muslims.

The guidelines can be read further here JAKIM

Kerismuddin Daughter Sexy Photos

Kuching
Sunday, 14th Aug 2011

Kerismudin Daughter's Erotic Photos

I received these photos from  one of  Bukittunggal.com loyal reader. According to him, the the photos are  belong to Hishamuddin Hussien or popularly known as KerisMudin's  daughter.

For the benefit of the rest of  Visitors to Bukittunggal.com, please enjoy the photo below :-

Mupok Aku